2014
DOI: 10.1145/2661631
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Monte Carlo Methods for Value-at-Risk and Conditional Value-at-Risk

Abstract: Value-at-risk (VaR) and conditional value-at-risk (CVaR) are two widely used risk measures of large losses and are employed in the financial industry for risk management purposes. In practice, loss distributions typically do not have closed-form expressions, but they can often be simulated (i.e., random observations of the loss distribution may be obtained by running a computer program). Therefore, Monte Carlo methods that design simulation experiments and utilize simulated observations are often employed in e… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
44
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 84 publications
(46 citation statements)
references
References 86 publications
2
44
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Specifically, we study estimation, optimization, and sensitivity analysis of SR. This is in line with the content of Hong, Hu, and Liu (), who reviewed Monte Carlo methods for the VaR and conditional value‐at‐risk (CVaR) measures.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 78%
“…Specifically, we study estimation, optimization, and sensitivity analysis of SR. This is in line with the content of Hong, Hu, and Liu (), who reviewed Monte Carlo methods for the VaR and conditional value‐at‐risk (CVaR) measures.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 78%
“…They have been extensively used in financial industry, especially after the financial crisis in 2008. An abundant literature has dedicated to studying the estimation and optimization of risk measures under various settings; in particular, [Hong et al 2014] provides a comprehensive review of Monte Carlo methods for VaR and CVaR.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To reduce the large amount of simulation effort needed in the inner level, Broadie et al (2015) proposed a regression method and Hong et al (2017) proposed a kernel method to avoid nested simulations. Interested readers may see Hong et al (2014) for a recent comprehensive review on simulation methods in estimating risk measures.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%