2003
DOI: 10.1007/978-0-387-21617-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Monte Carlo Methods in Financial Engineering

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

11
2,188
0
50

Year Published

2008
2008
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2,289 publications
(2,249 citation statements)
references
References 250 publications
(646 reference statements)
11
2,188
0
50
Order By: Relevance
“…The main theorem in this paper proves that the computational complexity for this simple case can be reduced to O ( −2 (log ) 2 ) through the use of a multilevel method which reduces the variance, leaving unchanged the bias due to the Euler discretisation. The multilevel method is very easy to implement and can be combined, in principle, with other variance reduction methods such as stratified sampling [7] and quasi Monte Carlo methods [16,17,19] to obtain even greater savings.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The main theorem in this paper proves that the computational complexity for this simple case can be reduced to O ( −2 (log ) 2 ) through the use of a multilevel method which reduces the variance, leaving unchanged the bias due to the Euler discretisation. The multilevel method is very easy to implement and can be combined, in principle, with other variance reduction methods such as stratified sampling [7] and quasi Monte Carlo methods [16,17,19] to obtain even greater savings.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our calibration procedure relies essentially upon the next formula which follows from (11), (12), (26), and taking the assumptions of Section 3.5 into account.…”
Section: Calibrationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In condition (a) the inverse transformation requirement can be replaced by the assumption that all Y j -components are Gaussian: when Y ∼ N(µ, σ 2 ), thenỸ = 2µ −Y ∼ N(µ, σ 2 ), and clearly Y andỸ are negatively correlated. This alternative assumption is typically applied in financial engineering for option pricing (Glasserman, 2003).…”
Section: Antithetic and Common Random Numbersmentioning
confidence: 99%