2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.nima.2021.165073
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Monte Carlo model validation of a detector system used for Positron Emission Particle Tracking

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
25
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Additionally, the two detector heads can be moved between 250 mm and 800 mm of separation which can accommodate a variety of experiments 18,19 . A full description of this model and its original calibration can be found in Herald, et al (2021) 8 . The Forte and the GATE model of the Forte are shown in Figure 1.…”
Section: Gate Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Additionally, the two detector heads can be moved between 250 mm and 800 mm of separation which can accommodate a variety of experiments 18,19 . A full description of this model and its original calibration can be found in Herald, et al (2021) 8 . The Forte and the GATE model of the Forte are shown in Figure 1.…”
Section: Gate Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several detectors have been modelled using GATE and validated against experimental measurements such as the Phillips/ADAC Forte, Siemens Inveon, and Phillips Vereos Positron Emission Tomography (PET) scanners [8][9][10] . For PET systems, performance characterisation experiments are described by the National Electronics Manufacturers Associated (NEMA) which test the spatial resolution, sensitivity, and count-rate response 11 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The University of Birmingham 15 . The Monte Carlo model was written using the GATE software package 17 , used to replicate the characteristics of positron emission and scanners through the use of validated physics models.…”
Section: A Simulated Gate Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many steps in the digitizer model correspond directly to measurable properties of the detector, such as the energy resolution, dead-time, or time resolution 10 . Values for these properties are often provided by the manufacturer and this can serve as a reliable starting point, but manual tuning is still needed to match the simulated and experimental response of the detector due to variation between each detector 8 . Conversely, with a model-fitting approach, manual tuning can be avoided, but other challenges arise.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%