“…While exploring the solution tree with MCTS as done in [13] is efficient, we show we can still speed up the search for a solution significantly more. The tree structure imposes an ordering of the possible 3D models to pick from.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…For example two primitives should not intersect. To tackle this problem, we take inspiration from a recent work on 3D scene understanding [13]. [13] proposes to rely on the Monte Carlo Tree Search (MCTS) algorithm to handle a similar combinatorial problem to select objects' 3D models: The MCTS algorithm is probably best known as the algorithm used by AlphaGo [29].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To tackle this problem, we take inspiration from a recent work on 3D scene understanding [13]. [13] proposes to rely on the Monte Carlo Tree Search (MCTS) algorithm to handle a similar combinatorial problem to select objects' 3D models: The MCTS algorithm is probably best known as the algorithm used by AlphaGo [29]. It is typically used to explore the tree of possible moves in the game Go because it scales particularly well to high combinatorics.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is typically used to explore the tree of possible moves in the game Go because it scales particularly well to high combinatorics. [13] adapts it to 3D models selection by considering a move as the selection of a 3D model for one object, and showed it performs significantly better than the simple hill-climbing algorithm that is sometimes used for similar problems [34]. Another advantage of this approach is that it does not impose assumptions on the form of the objective function, unlike other approaches based on graphs, for example [26].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Comparative overview The hill-climbing algorithm-simply taking the primitive that improves the most the objective function-can terminate × quickly as it gets stuck into a local minimum because of the constraints between primitives. MCTS as used in [13] explores iteratively the solution tree by traversing blue paths, updating which primitives are the most promising ones, but keeping the tree structure fixed. At each iteration, our approach also updates (→) which primitives are the most promising ones, and starts with them.…”
Project page: https://michaelramamonjisoa.github.io/projects/MonteBoxFinder Fig. 1. Given a noisy 3D scan with missing data, our method extracts many possible cuboids, and then efficiently selects the subset that fits the scan best.
“…While exploring the solution tree with MCTS as done in [13] is efficient, we show we can still speed up the search for a solution significantly more. The tree structure imposes an ordering of the possible 3D models to pick from.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…For example two primitives should not intersect. To tackle this problem, we take inspiration from a recent work on 3D scene understanding [13]. [13] proposes to rely on the Monte Carlo Tree Search (MCTS) algorithm to handle a similar combinatorial problem to select objects' 3D models: The MCTS algorithm is probably best known as the algorithm used by AlphaGo [29].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To tackle this problem, we take inspiration from a recent work on 3D scene understanding [13]. [13] proposes to rely on the Monte Carlo Tree Search (MCTS) algorithm to handle a similar combinatorial problem to select objects' 3D models: The MCTS algorithm is probably best known as the algorithm used by AlphaGo [29]. It is typically used to explore the tree of possible moves in the game Go because it scales particularly well to high combinatorics.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is typically used to explore the tree of possible moves in the game Go because it scales particularly well to high combinatorics. [13] adapts it to 3D models selection by considering a move as the selection of a 3D model for one object, and showed it performs significantly better than the simple hill-climbing algorithm that is sometimes used for similar problems [34]. Another advantage of this approach is that it does not impose assumptions on the form of the objective function, unlike other approaches based on graphs, for example [26].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Comparative overview The hill-climbing algorithm-simply taking the primitive that improves the most the objective function-can terminate × quickly as it gets stuck into a local minimum because of the constraints between primitives. MCTS as used in [13] explores iteratively the solution tree by traversing blue paths, updating which primitives are the most promising ones, but keeping the tree structure fixed. At each iteration, our approach also updates (→) which primitives are the most promising ones, and starts with them.…”
Project page: https://michaelramamonjisoa.github.io/projects/MonteBoxFinder Fig. 1. Given a noisy 3D scan with missing data, our method extracts many possible cuboids, and then efficiently selects the subset that fits the scan best.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.