2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.apradiso.2013.03.015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Monte Carlo simulation by GEANT 4 and GESPECOR of in situ gamma-ray spectrometry measurements

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In reality, the lack of standard sources with different geometries and matrices makes the experimental determination of the detector efficiency, an arduous task (Abbas et al, 2002;Mostajaboddavati et al, 2006;Chirosca et al, 2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In reality, the lack of standard sources with different geometries and matrices makes the experimental determination of the detector efficiency, an arduous task (Abbas et al, 2002;Mostajaboddavati et al, 2006;Chirosca et al, 2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To reach this purpose, an attempt was made to develop locally a reliable computational model useful for environmental applications (Guti errez-Villanueva et al, 2008;Dababneh et al, 2014). The Monte Carlo (MC) method is well appropriate to perform the calibration and to reproduce the detector response for a variety of matrices and for different geometries with sufficient accuracy (Bochud et al, 2006;R odenas et al, 2007;Sima and Arnold, 2009;Chirosca et al, 2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this perspective, Monte Carlo simulations can overcome the limits of analytical solutions, which generally address the description of the sole unscattered gamma-ray flux, by providing information on the entire gamma spectra (Allyson and Sanderson, 1998;Androulakaki et al, 2016;Vlastou et al, 2006). In a Monte Carlo simulation all parameters can be separately controlled and uncertainties coming from temporary variations in the experimental conditions can be excluded, which is particularly relevant in relation to calibration procedures and feasibility studies (Chirosca et al, 2013;De Groot et al, 2009;Van der Graaf et al, 2011). This peculiarity makes the methodology highly versatile in terms of input boundary conditions and extraordinarily effective in both investigating the effects of individual variables (e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Examples range from radiation protection of restricted areas to the understanding of energy deposition at the cellular level [1]. In radionuclide metrology, MC calculations have been proven as very useful for gamma spectrometer calibration [2][3][4][5][6][7], but also for gamma spectrometer self-attenuation [8,9] or coincidence summing [10,11], dose calibrators [12,13], extrapolation ionization chambers [14], assay of radioactive waste [15], primary measurement like 4 πγ counting [16] or triple to double coincidence ratio [17] methods. Several general purpose Monte Carlo codes, such as GEANT [18], EGS [19], MCNP [20], and PENELOPE [21], can be tailored to particular applications and also, special purpose codes are available to solve specific problems.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%