1997
DOI: 10.1088/0953-8984/9/25/011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Monte Carlo simulation of a mixed spin 2 and spin Ising ferrimagnetic system

Abstract: The critical behaviour of a mixed ferrimagnetic Ising system on a square lattice in which the two interpenetrating square sublattices have spins σ (± 1 2 ) and S (±2, ±1, 0) has been studied. We carried out exact ground state calculations and performed Monte Carlo simulations to obtain the finite-temperature phase diagram of the model. We found that the system that includes only a nearest-neighbour interaction and the crystal field does not have a compensation point. Also, our study seems to indicate that, con… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

5
26
2
1

Year Published

1999
1999
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
5
26
2
1
Order By: Relevance
“…While these lines start from about q d ¥ where d = -0.5 is the critical value of the reduced crystal field separating the ferrimagnetic region from the paramagnetic region at zero temperature, ends on a higher value of the reduced temperature and d on the second-order phase transition lines. The existence of the compensation temperature of this work shows disagreement with the results of Monte Carlo study [31], since where it was told that the system does not present any compensation temperature. It should also be mentioned that in [30] no discussion is given about the existence of the compensation temperature, as a result no comparison is possible with this work.…”
Section: The Second-and First-order Phase Transition Temperaturescontrasting
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…While these lines start from about q d ¥ where d = -0.5 is the critical value of the reduced crystal field separating the ferrimagnetic region from the paramagnetic region at zero temperature, ends on a higher value of the reduced temperature and d on the second-order phase transition lines. The existence of the compensation temperature of this work shows disagreement with the results of Monte Carlo study [31], since where it was told that the system does not present any compensation temperature. It should also be mentioned that in [30] no discussion is given about the existence of the compensation temperature, as a result no comparison is possible with this work.…”
Section: The Second-and First-order Phase Transition Temperaturescontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…As we mentioned above the existence of a tricritical point for 4 q = [30] is in disagreement with this work and of [31]. The Monte Carlo calculations [31] are carried out only on a square lattice, i.e. 4 q = , and no triciritcal point is observed, which also means that the system does not yield a tricritical point for 3 q = , in agreement with this work.…”
Section: The Second-and First-order Phase Transition Temperaturessupporting
confidence: 67%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…(1) does not play a role on the compensation temperature, whereas observation of the compensation temperature depends on the parameters J 4 and D. This point has been discussed in Refs. [13,14]. Therefore, in this study, we have particularly focused on the effect of the different dilution rates with non-magnetic atoms N for arbitrary fixed J 1 , J 4 and D. On the other hand, to analyze the effect of the non-magnetic atoms on the critical and compensation temperatures, for fixed J 1 ¼ À2, the second zero denotes the temperature value at which M is zero which corresponds to critical temperature point.…”
Section: Numerical Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%