2005
DOI: 10.1002/sia.2114
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Monte Carlo simulation of Nb Kα secondary fluorescence in EPMA: comparison of PENELOPE simulations with experimental results

Abstract: Secondary fluorescence across phase boundaries is a difficult problem encountered in several electron probe microanalysis (EPMA) situations: diffusion couples; small phases enclosed in a larger phases; eutectic intergrowths; and thin films. In some cases, it is possible to construct nondiffused couples and to measure the amount of secondary fluorescence across the phase boundary, but in most cases this is difficult, time consuming, expensive, or impossible. It is thus desirable to model the secondary fluoresce… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
18
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
1
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…10), similar to that observed in the $2.7 Ga Jeerinah Fm and $2.5 Ga Mount McRae Shale in Western Australia (Ono et al, 2003) as well as the $2.5 Ga Klein Naute Fm in South Africa (Ono et al, 2009). Pyrite with positive d 34 S and large, positive D 33 S likely received its sulfur from atmospheric S 8 , whereas pyrite with negative D 33 S and large, (Fournelle et al, 2005). Scale bars are 10 lm.…”
Section: Detrital Pyritesupporting
confidence: 75%
“…10), similar to that observed in the $2.7 Ga Jeerinah Fm and $2.5 Ga Mount McRae Shale in Western Australia (Ono et al, 2003) as well as the $2.5 Ga Klein Naute Fm in South Africa (Ono et al, 2009). Pyrite with positive d 34 S and large, positive D 33 S likely received its sulfur from atmospheric S 8 , whereas pyrite with negative D 33 S and large, (Fournelle et al, 2005). Scale bars are 10 lm.…”
Section: Detrital Pyritesupporting
confidence: 75%
“…Nowadays, all the quantification routines are based on these models, some of which have been developed under the assumption that bremsstrahlung fluorescence correction is negligible when compared to characteristic enhancement; however, no concluding arguments have been provided in order to support this assumption. Monte Carlo simulations constitute a very important tool for estimating the fluorescence enhancement, and a number of specific situations have already been faced with this approach (Fisher, ; Llovet et al ., ; Fournelle et al ., ; Tylko, ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite there exist many approaches available for the assessment of fluorescence enhancement (Reed, 1965; Ugarte et al, 1987), it is impossible to compare these predictions with experimental data as the photons produced by fluoresced atoms cannot be discriminated from the total recorded radiation. Therefore, Monte Carlo simulations constitute a very important tool for estimating the fluorescence enhancement and a number of specific situations have been faced with this approach (Fisher, 1971; Hu & Pan, 2001; Llovet & Galan, 2003; Fournelle et al, 2005; Fournelle, 2007).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%