2008
DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/53/19/c02
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Monte Carlo simulation of primary electron production inside an a-selenium detector for x-ray mammography: physics

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

2
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The primary electron generation model simulates the primary electron production from x-raymatter interactions (incoherent scattering, photoelectric absorption) as well as due to atomic deexcitation (fluorescent photon production, Auger and Coster-Kronig (CK) electron emission) inside the photoconducting materials mentioned above [1,2]. It is based on a validated model developed by Spyrou et al [3] that simulates the x-ray energy spectrum sampling as well as the x-ray photon interactions.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The primary electron generation model simulates the primary electron production from x-raymatter interactions (incoherent scattering, photoelectric absorption) as well as due to atomic deexcitation (fluorescent photon production, Auger and Coster-Kronig (CK) electron emission) inside the photoconducting materials mentioned above [1,2]. It is based on a validated model developed by Spyrou et al [3] that simulates the x-ray energy spectrum sampling as well as the x-ray photon interactions.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Consequently, the characteristics of the mammographic image strongly depend on the characteristics of the primary electrons. Distributions of primary electrons such as energy, angular and spatial distributions have been studied with the development of a Monte Carlo model that simulates the primary electron production inside suitable photoconducting materials such as a-Se, a-As 2 Se 3 , GaSe, GaAs, Ge, CdTe, CdZnTe, Cd 0.8 Zn 0.2 Te, ZnTe, PbO, TlBr, PbI 2 and HgI 2 [1,2]. Using this model, in this paper the arithmetics of: (i) fluorescent photons, (ii) forwards and backwards escaping primary and fluorescent photons and (iii) primary electrons are being investigated for the case of CdTe, CdZnTe, Cd 0.8 Zn 0.2 Te and ZnTe, for monoenergetic x-ray spectra in the mammographic energy range.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to illustrate the results in a pictorial form, the exposure map under the phantom ͑which is provided with a spatial resolution of 50 m͒ was converted to an eight-bit gray scale representation, with the exposure of 2 mR corresponding to the gray level value of 125. This output signal can be utilized in the form of subject contrast ͑if the characteristic curve is considered͒ or exit spectrum per detector pixel ͑for complete detector studies͒, as the input to a conventional screen film 29 or a digital detector, 30,31 and the image can be generated, taking into account the effect of the actual response curve of the detector.…”
Section: Simulation Of the Mammographic Processmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although this approximation can be considered simplified, since it is based on analytical calculations, and not on Monte Carlo, and it does not take into account the angle of the exiting photon, it was considered adequate for the purpose of this study. A more sophisticated approach must include the simulation of the physical properties of the detector and the extraction, though Monte Carlo techniques, of the deposited dose, or the generated optical photons, 35 generated electrons, 31 given as input the spectrum of the photons exiting the mathematical phantom per detector pixel. number of about 5 ϫ 10 9 initial x-ray photons, and a mean computational time of 28 h, on a 3.2 GHz, P-IV computer.…”
Section: E Detector Characteristics-image Formationmentioning
confidence: 99%