2004
DOI: 10.1080/05698190490431867
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Monte Carlo Simulation of Sudden Death Bearing Testing

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Sudden death testing in groups is preferred over the single tester as it reduces the testing cost of the product. Sudden death testing technique has been explored by many quality control researchers including [3][4][5][6]. It is common to use the Weibull distribution for modeling lifetime phenomena.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sudden death testing in groups is preferred over the single tester as it reduces the testing cost of the product. Sudden death testing technique has been explored by many quality control researchers including [3][4][5][6]. It is common to use the Weibull distribution for modeling lifetime phenomena.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sometimes, to reduce testing time, group acceptance sampling plans have been used. In this case the total number of items ͑n͒ to be tested is divided into equal-sized groups according to the number of available experimental testers, see, for example, Pascual and Meeker [6] or Vleck, Hendricks, and Zaretsky [7]. There are r items in each group, and there are a total of "g" groups, so that n = rg.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…33), in sudden death testing, the total number of specimens to be evaluated is divided into equal subgroups that can be evaluated simultaneously. The first subgroup of specimens is run simultaneously until the first failure occurs.…”
Section: Appendix B-sudden Death Testing Techniquesmentioning
confidence: 99%