We compare the electronic structures of metal(II) (Co, Ni, Cu) phthalocyanines adsorbed on conducting and insulating substrates: Au(111) and the organic ferroelectric polyvinylidene fluoride (PVDF). The different 3d orbital contributions to the metal phthalocyanines result in different substrate interactions, and different molecular orbital offsets. When adsorbed on the ferroelectric PVDF surface, the photoemission and inverse photoemission spectra suggest that cobalt phthalocyanine (CoPc) bonds more strongly to both Au(111) and PVDF, resulting in a preferential planar configuration on the PVDF surface, not observed with nickel phthalocyanine (NiPc) and copper phthalocyanine (CuPc).
A IntroductionFor molecular electronics, the energy level alignment is one of the key factors that determine charge injection and ultimately device performance. The electronic structure at an interface, be it metal-organic or molecular to molecular, is determined by a variety of competing and inter-related factors: adsorbate interactions, interface dipoles, charge transfer and molecular orientation and alignment. While large macrocyclic metalorganic and organometallic complexes tend to lie flat (that is to say with the long molecular axis parallel with the surface), like the metal phthalocyanines, this orientation is not always adopted at an interface. The metal phthalocyanines provide a means for exploring the influence of the center metal atom 3d filling on the molecular interactions at an interface, and thus provide an opportunity for investigating the interface interactions in a systematic fashion.For many large molecular adlayers, including a number of organic and metal-organic species, the energy level alignment of the adsorbate and the molecular orientation are dependent upon the interfacial electronic structure and the interfacial dipole layer. This influence of the interface has been readily demonstrated for many large molecules, 1-3 including the metal phthalocyanines. 4