1992
DOI: 10.1016/0039-6028(92)90289-i
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Monte Carlo study of phase transitions and scattering intensities in a model of Au(110)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

2
47
0

Year Published

1993
1993
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
3
3

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(49 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
2
47
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[3,4] Based on theoretical considerations and on simulation work, an interesting and nontrivial interplay has been anticipated between in-plane disordering, related to deconstruction, and vertical disordering, related to roughening, [5] and many other studies have been devoted to the problem. [6][7][8][9][10][11][12] The situation is, in principle, somewhat different for the two types of situations, i.e., the unreconstructed and the MR reconstructed cases. On an fcc (110) surface one can identify two interpenetrating rectangular sublattices, with origin, say, at 0 (the "white" sublattice) and A at ( √ 2x +ŷ +ẑ)a/2 (the "black" sublattice) where a is the lattice parameter,x = (001),ŷ = (110), andẑ = (110).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…[3,4] Based on theoretical considerations and on simulation work, an interesting and nontrivial interplay has been anticipated between in-plane disordering, related to deconstruction, and vertical disordering, related to roughening, [5] and many other studies have been devoted to the problem. [6][7][8][9][10][11][12] The situation is, in principle, somewhat different for the two types of situations, i.e., the unreconstructed and the MR reconstructed cases. On an fcc (110) surface one can identify two interpenetrating rectangular sublattices, with origin, say, at 0 (the "white" sublattice) and A at ( √ 2x +ŷ +ẑ)a/2 (the "black" sublattice) where a is the lattice parameter,x = (001),ŷ = (110), andẑ = (110).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…den Nijs has argued that, in such a case, the phase diagram should be qualitatively the same as that of a simple cubic (100) surface. [13] In particular, den Nijs, [13] Jug and Tosatti, [14] Kohanoff et al, [7] and Mazzeo et al [11] argued that (110) surfaces like those of Ag and Pd (which do not reconstruct) are good candidates for realizations of preroughening, a critical (non-universal) transition from a low temperature ordered phase to an intermediate disordered flat phase, previously identified in the context of restricted solid-on-solid models for simple cubic (100) surfaces. [15] In terms of the two ground states of the unreconstructed surface, the preroughening transition can be viewed as a disordering of the surface due to the proliferation of monoatomic steps (see Fig.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations