2011
DOI: 10.1103/physrevd.83.014018
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Monte Carlo treatment of hadronic interactions in enhanced Pomeron scheme: QGSJET-II model

Abstract: The construction of a Monte Carlo generator for high energy hadronic and nuclear collisions is discussed in detail. Interactions are treated in the framework of the Reggeon Field Theory, taking into consideration enhanced Pomeron diagrams which are resummed to all orders in the triple-Pomeron coupling. Soft and "semihard" contributions to the underlying parton dynamics are accounted for within the "semihard Pomeron" approach. The structure of cut enhanced diagrams is analyzed; they are regrouped into a number … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

11
857
0
8

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
2

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 930 publications
(876 citation statements)
references
References 63 publications
11
857
0
8
Order By: Relevance
“…Their water-Cherenkov type SD could count the number of muons in EAS, and was observed the surplus muon on the ground [12]. While the numbers of electro-magnetic component agreed with the prediction of the hadron interaction models, 33% more muons were detected than predicted by the EPOS-LHC [13] and 60% more were detected than predicted by the QGSJET II-04 [14].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 64%
“…Their water-Cherenkov type SD could count the number of muons in EAS, and was observed the surplus muon on the ground [12]. While the numbers of electro-magnetic component agreed with the prediction of the hadron interaction models, 33% more muons were detected than predicted by the EPOS-LHC [13] and 60% more were detected than predicted by the QGSJET II-04 [14].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 64%
“…The variance of the logarithmic masses is almost constant until 10 18.3 eV and then starts to decrease. ⟨ln A⟩ shows reasonable results for both interaction models over the whole energy range, but the σ 2 (ln A) values derived from QGSJetII-04 [5] for energies > 10 18.4 eV become negative, which is unphysical and could indicate some tension between the measured data and the theoretical interaction model. However, the current systematic uncertainties do not allow any strong claims concerning the interaction model predictions.…”
Section: Average Atmospheric Depth Of Maximum Shower Developmentmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…In the energy range, the composition of the primary cosmic rays is consistent with proton within statistical and systematic errors by X max measurement using the TA FD [6][7][8][9], thus we use the MC for proton primaries. The experimental data is compared with the MC using the hadronic models QGSJET II-03, QGSJET II-04 [10], Epos 1.99 [11] and Sibyll 2.1 [12].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%