2019
DOI: 10.1302/1863-2548.13.190131
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Monteggia lesion and its equivalents in children

Abstract: Purpose The aim of the study is to evaluate our group of paediatric patients with Monteggia lesion and its equivalents and to compare the characteristics of basic types of these lesions concerning therapeutic approach and results of the treatment. Methods Retrospective study of 111 children treated in the Department of Pediatric and Trauma Surgery of the Thomayer Hospital in Prague between 2001 and 2013 (13 years). When evaluating the outcome of the therapy, Bruce’s criteria modified by Letts that assesses ran… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
18
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Sometimes a small fleck of metaphyseal bone around the proximal radial diaphysis can be seen, indicating SH II fracture or transverse fracture through the neck of the radius. In a study by Čepelík et al [ 19 ], the proximal radial physeal separation of SH type II was the most common among equivalents in their study. ElKhouly et al [ 13 ] reported a variant associated with SH type II injury and anterior radial head dislocation in a 10-year-old boy and proposed that Monteggia equivalent lesions with an SH fracture of the proximal radius are an unstable fracture configuration.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Sometimes a small fleck of metaphyseal bone around the proximal radial diaphysis can be seen, indicating SH II fracture or transverse fracture through the neck of the radius. In a study by Čepelík et al [ 19 ], the proximal radial physeal separation of SH type II was the most common among equivalents in their study. ElKhouly et al [ 13 ] reported a variant associated with SH type II injury and anterior radial head dislocation in a 10-year-old boy and proposed that Monteggia equivalent lesions with an SH fracture of the proximal radius are an unstable fracture configuration.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…If inadequate treatment is applied, equivalent lesions may lead to poor clinical and radiographic results[ 2 ]. Čepelík et al [ 19 ] warned of worse results in the treatment of Monteggia equivalents, and operative treatment was indicated in most patients in this group[ 19 ]. As reported by Olney and Menelaus, 10 of the 14 (71.4%) patients with Monteggia type I equivalent lesions involving the proximal radius required surgery[ 6 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Se presente, e observada a presença de fratura na ulna, deve ser considerado o quadro clássico de Monteggia. Nosso paciente apresentava luxação anterior da cabeça do rádio com deformida-de da ulna com ápice anterior, o que configura um quadro de Monteggia do tipo 1, tipo mais comum nos pacientes pediátricos (5)(6)(7)(8) .…”
Section: Discussionunclassified
“…The discussion has never stopped over 'the equivalent' as to its presentation, injury combination, mechanism, diagnosis, and management in the past several decades when a few sporadic case reports demonstrated some of the unclassifiable 'equivalent'. [8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20] A most recent contribution towards the definition has been made by Čepelík et al 21 and his group in their study of 111 cases. They defined it as an ulnar fracture at any level combined with 'displaced' (with undisplaced or minimal displaced ones were not included) proximal radial fracture, which embraced Olney criteria and was consistent with Bado Ia-Ic.…”
Section: Definitionmentioning
confidence: 99%