Monterrey y su ámbito regional (1850-1910). Referencia histórica y sugerencias metodológicas

Cerutti, Mario

doi:10.18234/secuencia.v0i15.271

Cited by 3 publications

(3 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Inasmuch as the census became the source to studies on industrial growth, the latter excluded metallurgy from what was considered «industry». For one early example, in the same volume coauthored by Beltrán et al (1960), a chapter deals with the «capitalisation of national industry, according to census data», in which metallurgy is utterly absent (Fernández Hurtado 1960, p. 616). Almost three decades afterwards, Enrique Cárdenas, in his pioneering work on Mexico’s industrialisation before 1929, relied on the same census to estimate industrial value added by branch, and thus left out metallurgy from his account of the industrial sector 16 .…”

Section: The Available Estimates Of Mexico’s Gdp By Sectors 1895-1945mentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The most commonly used indicator is the former, as it allows to measure a country’s economic performance, while the latter places the accent upon the performance of its citizens, inside their nation or abroad. Early estimates of Mexico’s total output came under the name of «Producto Nacional Bruto», that is to say, GNP (Fernández Hurtado 1960; Pérez López 1960). More than a conscious decision, it seems to be an inaccurate way to label data that aimed at representing Mexico’s GDP, as there was no attempt at estimating the contribution of Mexico’s citizens abroad.…”

Section: Why Was Metallurgy Excluded From the Industrial Sector?mentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

How Industrialised Was Mexico by 1929? A Small but Necessary Correction to Mexico’s National Accounts

Ficker¹

2017

RHE / JILAEH

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The purpose of this work is to correct an error contained in the historical record of Mexico’s GDP which has led to underestimate considerably the progress achieved by industrialisation in the Mexican economy before the Great Depression, also distorting its position within the Latin American context. This error consists in the misleading identification of industry with manufacture, ignoring the contribution to Mexican industrial production made by the metallurgical sector. By incorporating the value added from metallurgy to the net output of manufacture the share of industry in GDP grows accordingly, placing Mexico among the most industrialised countries of Latin America by the end of the export era.

show abstract

Section: The Available Estimates Of Mexico’s Gdp By Sectors 1895-1945mentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Why Was Metallurgy Excluded From the Industrial Sector?mentioning

confidence: 99%

How Industrialised Was Mexico by 1929? A Small but Necessary Correction to Mexico’s National Accounts

Ficker¹

2017

RHE / JILAEH

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Centre: Aguascalientes, Distrito Federal, Guanajuato, Hidalgo, Jalisco, México, Michoacán, Morelos, Puebla, Querétaro and Tlaxcala. In the case of Nuevo León, the wages of the highest-wage region are always applied to account for the particular characteristics of that state’s industry, which was one of the most modern in the country throughout the period (see, for instance: Haber, 1989; Cerutti, 1992; Marichal and Cerutti, 1997; Kuntz, 2010).…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

THE GDPPER CAPITAOF THE MEXICAN REGIONS (1895-1930): NEW ESTIMATES

Aguilar-Retureta

2015

RHE / JILAEH

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Apart from Appendini (1972) for 1900, there are, so far, no Mexican regional GDP estimates for the period before 1930. The aim of this paper is to fill this gap by presenting new Mexican regional GDP per capita estimates for several benchmark years between 1895 and 1930. The paper presents the methodology and sources used to estimate the new series, compares them with the previous estimates and offers a first long-term picture of Mexican regional per capita GDPs (1895-2010).

show abstract

Aproximaciones a la historia empresarial de Boyacá (Colombia), 1900-1930

Rodríguez¹

2014

Historelo.rev.hist.reg.local

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Este artículo de investigación se ocupa del estudio de la consolidación de empresas en el departamento de Boyacá, entre 1900 y 1930, el capital, la duración y el tipo de actores sociales vinculados, lo que a su vez nos aproxima al proyecto económico que se pretendió implementar en esta región colombiana. El trabajo se adscribe en la historia regional que da cuenta de las dinámicas propias que se generaron en cada región, para lo cual se partió de la revisión historiográfica sobre historia empresarial e historia regional que permitió comprender procesos de desarrollo particulares; posteriormente se realizó la revisión de los protocolos notariales, Notarías primera y segunda de Tunja 1900 – 1930, bajo la perspectiva de establecer el tipo de empresa, la coyuntura de consolidación y la incidencia en el ‘desarrollo’ del departamento. En el Departamento de Boyacá se conformaron sociedades y compañías anónimas para comercializar productos, para la producción manufacturera, desarrollo de actividades financieras, pavimentación de vías y mejoramiento de la producción agrícola, así, tanto mercaderes como casas mercantiles fueron los generadores de recursos que pretendieron comercializar productos nacionales e internacionales, y posiblemente generar cambios en la producción y en el consumo de la región. Approaches to History Business of Boyacá (Colombia), 1900-1930 AbstractThis research paper deals with the study of the consolidation of companies in the department of Boyacá, between 1900 and 1930, capital, duration and the type of social actors involved, which in turn approaches us closer to the economic project that was aimed to be implemented in this Colombian region. The work is ascribed in the regional history that gives account of its own dynamics that was generated in every region, for which the researcher took as point of departure a historiographical review of the business history and regional history for understanding processes of particular development; later on the review was conducted of notarial protocols , First and Second Tunja Notaries 1900 - 1930, under the perspective of establishing the type of company, the climate of consolidation and the impact on the “development” of the department. In the Departamento de Boyacá (department of Boyacá) societies and anonymous companies were formed to market products, for manufacturing, development of financial activities, road paving and improvement of agricultural production, thus, both merchants and merchant houses were the generators of resources that intended to market national and international products, and hopefully lead to changes in the production and consumption of the region products.Keywords: Business history, region, business, company, businessman, Boyacá

show abstract

Monterrey y su ámbito regional (1850-1910). Referencia histórica y sugerencias metodológicas

Cited by 3 publications

References 0 publications

How Industrialised Was Mexico by 1929? A Small but Necessary Correction to Mexico’s National Accounts

How Industrialised Was Mexico by 1929? A Small but Necessary Correction to Mexico’s National Accounts

THE GDPPER CAPITAOF THE MEXICAN REGIONS (1895-1930): NEW ESTIMATES

Aproximaciones a la historia empresarial de Boyacá (Colombia), 1900-1930

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About