2001
DOI: 10.1002/ijfe.142
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Month of the year effect and January effect in pre‐WWI stock returns: evidence from a non‐linear GARCH model

Abstract: This paper investigates seasonal anomalies in the mean stock returns of Germany, the UK and the US during pre-World War I (WWI) period. The anomalies studied are month of the year effect and the January effect. The empirical research is conducted using a non-linear GARCH-t model, and monthly returns. Results obtained provide evidence of the January effect and the month of the year effect on the UK and the US returns. The German returns shows the month of the year effect but no January effect. Given the lack of… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
27
1
2

Year Published

2009
2009
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
1
27
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The studies conducted by Nassir and Mohammad (1987), Pang (1988), Ayadi et al (1998) and Coutts and Sheikh (2000) have also discovered the existence of monthly effect for the emerging markets. However, they also found the same results as Wahlroos and Berglund (1983), Choudhry (2001), and Mehdian and Perry (2002); indicating unavailability of January effect for the some emerging markets. In addition to day of the week effect and the monthly effect; Wong and Ho (1986), Lakonishok and Smidt (1988), Wilson and Jones (1993), Mills and Coutts (1995), Chan et al (1996), Arsad and Coutts (1997), Mookerjee and Yu (1999), , and Abeysekera (2001) have considered holiday effect as well.…”
Section: Literature Reviewsupporting
confidence: 70%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The studies conducted by Nassir and Mohammad (1987), Pang (1988), Ayadi et al (1998) and Coutts and Sheikh (2000) have also discovered the existence of monthly effect for the emerging markets. However, they also found the same results as Wahlroos and Berglund (1983), Choudhry (2001), and Mehdian and Perry (2002); indicating unavailability of January effect for the some emerging markets. In addition to day of the week effect and the monthly effect; Wong and Ho (1986), Lakonishok and Smidt (1988), Wilson and Jones (1993), Mills and Coutts (1995), Chan et al (1996), Arsad and Coutts (1997), Mookerjee and Yu (1999), , and Abeysekera (2001) have considered holiday effect as well.…”
Section: Literature Reviewsupporting
confidence: 70%
“…Apart from the day of the week effect, Wahlroos and Berglund (1983), Choudhry (2001), and Mehdian and Perry (2002) have examined the monthly effect of the developed markets. Though, they have found the monthly effect; were unable to find the positive and higher January effect especially for the post war period.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The development of GARCH models stimulated the investigation on monthly seasonality of capital markets not only on the stock returns but also on volatility [ 8,11,19,24] In this paper we investigate the presence of Month-of-the-year effects on the Romanian capital market from 2000 to 2012. The Bucharest Stock Exchange (BSE) evolution in this period of time passed two stages.…”
Section: Thementioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, according to Ho and Cheung (1994), it is also important to consider fluctuations in volatility across the days of the week as high returns on a specific day may be attributed to higher risk on that day. In fact, based on the study of Choudhry (2001), 'study of the effects of any seasonality has been limited'. According to some studies, 2 financial time series seem to exhibit properties such as leptokurtosis, skewness and time-varying volatilities.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%