2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.parkreldis.2014.08.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Montreal Cognitive Assessment for the screening and prediction of cognitive decline in early Parkinson's disease

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
70
3
3

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 84 publications
(80 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
4
70
3
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Stages II and III. Mean scores for each PD H&Y stage group were similar to the cutoff of 26 to discriminate normal cognition from impairment identified in the literature (Nasreddine et al, 2005; Hoops et al, 2009; Dalrymple-Alford et al, 2010; Kandiah et al, 2014) and higher (more normal) than a recently proposed revised cutoff of 23 (Carson et al, 2018). Three HC and 12 PD had scores below 26, with a minimum score of 23.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 66%
“…Stages II and III. Mean scores for each PD H&Y stage group were similar to the cutoff of 26 to discriminate normal cognition from impairment identified in the literature (Nasreddine et al, 2005; Hoops et al, 2009; Dalrymple-Alford et al, 2010; Kandiah et al, 2014) and higher (more normal) than a recently proposed revised cutoff of 23 (Carson et al, 2018). Three HC and 12 PD had scores below 26, with a minimum score of 23.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 66%
“…Our own preliminary analyses provide more robust data validating the use of conversion scales to interchange between these scales (Michael Lawton - personal communication). In general, the MMSE may be more sensitive to change [12] but the MoCA seems to be superior and more sensitive for the detection of mild cognitive decline in PD [13,14], thus avoiding ceiling effects.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another is the uncertainty regarding the optimum SD cut-off for impairment when compared with age-adjusted normative means 32. Finally, the recommendation that a level 1 category diagnosis can be made using a global cognitive screening tool has been questioned after three of the recommended tests including the MoCA were shown to lack diagnostic accuracy when compared with level 2 category diagnosis,33 although the MoCA performed better in another recent study 34…”
Section: Diagnosismentioning
confidence: 99%