2015
DOI: 10.1017/cjn.2015.306
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Montreal Cognitive Assessment Performance in HIV/AIDS: Impact of Systemic Factors

Abstract: Background: A large proportion of people living with human immunodeficiency virus/acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (HIV/AIDS) suffer from neurocognitive impairment (NCI). The causes of the NCI are multifold in HIV infection although a subset of HIV/AIDS patients are affected by the spectrum syndrome, HIV-associated neurocognitive disorder (HAND). We investigated the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) in relation to clinical, demographic and laboratory findings as well as its ability to predict symptomatic … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This can induce a bias when evaluating cognitive impairment [ 42 , 70 ]. In addition, some other factors may introduce biases, including the total central nervous system penetration-effectiveness (CPE) score, polypharmacy, or medication side effects [ 76 ]. Nonetheless, heterogeneity is assumed in diagnostic test accuracy studies, and most approaches of estimating the test accuracy data consider these aspects in the analysis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This can induce a bias when evaluating cognitive impairment [ 42 , 70 ]. In addition, some other factors may introduce biases, including the total central nervous system penetration-effectiveness (CPE) score, polypharmacy, or medication side effects [ 76 ]. Nonetheless, heterogeneity is assumed in diagnostic test accuracy studies, and most approaches of estimating the test accuracy data consider these aspects in the analysis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We attempted to control for this in our eligibility criteria by using the MOCA brief screening tool and excluding those with a score indicating impaired cognition. However, the MOCA is not a diagnostic tool, and without a full neuropsychiatric exam, it is hard to know if we enrolled anyone with mild cognitive impairment (Koenig, Fujiwara, Gill, & Power, 2016). Furthermore, the elevated prevalence of neurocognitive dysfunction of PLHIV underscores a continued need to test and refine existing, successful self-management interventions and to continue tailoring them to the target population, including to their neurocognitive function.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Inappropriate exclusions were avoided in five studies (Janssen et al 2015;Nam Su Ku et al 2014;Joska et al 2016;Milanini et al 2016;Overton et al 2013). On the other hand, one study excluded eight patients from the initial selection because of their low educational level (< grade 7) and one owing to incomplete testing (Koenig et al 2016).…”
Section: Methodological Quality Of Included Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In all studies except one (Milanini et al 2016) it was unclear if the index test results were interpreted without knowledge of the results of the reference standard. In addition, the pre-specification of threshold was absent or unclear in four studies (Nam Su Ku et al 2014;Fazeli et al 2017;Koenig et al 2016, Milanini et al 2016, and this finding was also considered to present an unclear risk of bias.…”
Section: Methodological Quality Of Included Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%