Monuments, power and contested space— the iconography of Sackville Street (O'Connell Street) before independence (1922)

Abstract

This paper explores the iconography of Dublin's central thoroughfare, O'Connell Street, formerly Sackville Street, as it evolved in the decades before Independence. Theoretically informed by recent developments in the fields of cultural and historical geography, it makes use of metaphors such as the city as text and the iconography of landscape. The paper focuses in particular on the role of public statuary in articulating issues of cultural and political identity in a city of contested space. The monuments erected on this street during the nineteenth and early-twentieth centuries capture in microcosm broader trends in public statuary whereby monuments were erected to express loyalty to Empire on the one hand and opposition to such imperial rule on the other. It is argued that these public statues provide the geographer with an important lens through which to explore the processes at work in shaping the city and which give tangible expression to often competing ideologies. A following paper will chart the iconography of O'Connell Street in the decades after 1922.

Monuments to the Duke of Wellington in nineteenth-century Ireland: forging British and imperial identities

“…As facets of the symbolic landscape, various authors have attempted to unravel the meanings bound up in monuments and at particular monumental sites (Young 1992, Johnson 1994, 1995, Peet 1996, Atkinson and Cosgrove 1998, Hill 1998, Osborne 1998, Whelan 2001, Gordon and Osborne 2004, Larsen 2012. According to Martin Auster (1997, p. 219), 'public monuments are of special interest as focal points of meaning in the landscape' and multiple layers of meaning can be unearthed even within the most abstract of monuments.…”

“…Ireland during the nineteenth century partook to some extent in that era's Europe-wide trend of 'statuemania', a movement which also prevailed in North America during the same period. Whelan (2001Whelan ( , 2002Whelan ( , 2003, Johnson (1994Johnson ( , 1995 and Hill (1998) are among those who have highlighted the impact of the increased drive to erect public monuments on the nineteenth-century Irish landscape and discussed the potential symbolic significance of the resultant memorials. Of such monuments, three erected in early nineteenth-century Ireland were dedicated to one man in particular: Sir Arthur Wellesley, the first Duke of Wellington.…”

‘Beacons of modernity’: Department stores, modernity and the urban experience in mid‐twentieth century Ireland

“…For what was once seen as 'unremarkable' now seems more extraordinary in view of untold social and economic changes. It is possible to detect in some recent historical research a new interest in the tangible experience of urban life, for example through identity, sexuality, symbolization or suburbanization (Nash, 1997;Ryan, 1998a;Whelan, 2001;McManus, 2002). This new urban history of Ireland has made effective use of previously unexplored events in constructing a more ontological view of Irish urbanity and its absorption of modernity.…”

Negotiating postcolonial legacies: shifting conservation narratives and residual colonial built heritage in Ireland

“…Fourthly, outside of the main urban centres, landlord estates represented domination of landownership and agricultural production, manifested in large estate houses (referred to as the 'big house') and remodelled rural villages. In the postcolonial context, the built environment can, therefore, be associated with colonial power (Whelan, 2001(Whelan, , 2002(Whelan, , 2003, but also becomes a nation-building and political tool (Kincaid, 2006;Moore and Whelan, 2007). Thus, residual colonial memories are not necessarily the inevitable product of history or cultural conditions, but may be the result of deliberate and strategic action by political actors within policy struggles.…”