2020
DOI: 10.1021/acsaem.0c01479
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

MoO3-Deposited Graphite Felt for High-Performance Vanadium Redox Flow Batteries

Abstract: To overcome the challenge of the low power density of all-vanadium flow batteries, electrodes with enhanced electrochemical activity are necessary. A facile and scalable impregnation process was employed to deposit MoO 3 particles on the surface of a graphite felt (GF) (MoGF) electrode. In the cyclic voltammetry profiles, the as-prepared electrode exhibits superior electrocatalytic activity toward the redox couple of VO 2+/ VO 2 + , significantly enhancing the reversibility, as indicated by the substantially r… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 60 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Graphite felt and carbon paper, which are commonly used as electrodes in VRFBs, show poor electrochemical activity, leading to limited power and current outputs. To address this issue, structural engineering and surface modifications are suggested to design new carbon electrodes. Although absorption of active species such as metals, metal oxides, and metal nitrides on the felt support is used in the electrode development, their high-cost, instability, and poor electronic conductivity inhibit application in the battery system. Structural engineering involves designing nanoporous structures to decorate complex interfaces. A sacrificial template is used to introduce nanopores on graphite felt, resulting in an improved energy efficiency . Similarly, a wood-derived carbon electrode is used, which improves the battery performance due to the presence of aligned channels and large pores .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Graphite felt and carbon paper, which are commonly used as electrodes in VRFBs, show poor electrochemical activity, leading to limited power and current outputs. To address this issue, structural engineering and surface modifications are suggested to design new carbon electrodes. Although absorption of active species such as metals, metal oxides, and metal nitrides on the felt support is used in the electrode development, their high-cost, instability, and poor electronic conductivity inhibit application in the battery system. Structural engineering involves designing nanoporous structures to decorate complex interfaces. A sacrificial template is used to introduce nanopores on graphite felt, resulting in an improved energy efficiency . Similarly, a wood-derived carbon electrode is used, which improves the battery performance due to the presence of aligned channels and large pores .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…EIS was performed on the GF-cell and GF-cell_FT at 50% SOC (Figure S9), in which the GF-cell_FT demonstrated alleviated cell polarization due to the smaller electrolyte resistance of the iThub. Although the theoretical capacity of Zn-Ce RFBs is similar to that of VRFB, , the discharge capacity of conventional Zn-Ce RFBs is far lower than that of VRFB due to the low CE, which can be addressed by our dual-membrane design. While the discharge capacity of the GF-cell_FT and GF-cell is elevated to the same level as for VRFB (12–14 Ah/L), ,, the discharge energy density is significantly higher than that of VRFB, owing to the high discharge voltage.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the theoretical capacity of Zn-Ce RFBs is similar to that of VRFB, , the discharge capacity of conventional Zn-Ce RFBs is far lower than that of VRFB due to the low CE, which can be addressed by our dual-membrane design. While the discharge capacity of the GF-cell_FT and GF-cell is elevated to the same level as for VRFB (12–14 Ah/L), ,, the discharge energy density is significantly higher than that of VRFB, owing to the high discharge voltage. In addition, the polarization curve of the GF-cell recorded at 70% SOC is shown in Figure c, in which a peak power density of 360.4 mW cm –2 is demonstrated.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%