Mood as input: People have to interpret the motivational implications of their moods.

Martin, Leonard L.; Ward, David W.; Achee, John W.; Wyer, Robert S.

doi:10.1037//0022-3514.64.3.317

Cited by 12 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…For example, in the study by N. Hao and colleagues, it was shown that the congruence between implicit emotional states (induced by a closed or open body posture) and explicit emotional states (induced by watching video clips) enhances creativity (Hao et al, 2017). Similar results have been found in other studies (Martin et al, 1993). It is possible that the effect of emotional congruence was also observed in our study.…”

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 91%

Untitled

2023

psychology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 91%

Untitled

2023

psychology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

The Get Ready Mind-Set: How Gearing Up for Later Impacts Effort Allocation Now

2010

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

People need to allocate their limited cognitive resources to current and future tasks. We provide evidence that anticipating the resource demands of a future task creates a "get ready mind-set" that mobilizes these resources. However, the mobilized resources for the future task can carry over to unrelated current tasks. This implies the counterintuitive notion that anticipating difficult tasks in the future leads to greater effort expenditure on unrelated tasks in the present. We also demonstrate that resource carryover is particularly likely when consumers' ability to separate tasks is low, whereas resource conservation is more likely when ability to separate is high. (c) 2009 by JOURNAL OF CONSUMER RESEARCH, Inc..

show abstract

Pride and Regulatory Behavior: The Influence of Appraisal Information and Self-Regulatory Goals

Salerno¹,

Laran²,

Janiszewski³

2015

J Consum Res

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Prior research has demonstrated that while people experience pride after an accomplishment, its experience can both encourage and discourage subsequent regulatory behavior. The current research shows that this seemingly contradictory influence can be accounted for by considering the information about the event that generated the pride (i.e., appraisal information) and whether or not a self-regulatory goal is active. In the absence of a self-regulatory goal, appraisal information concerning the locus of control (e.g., "I contributed to this achievement; it was not luck") can be used to make positive inferences about one's self-concept that reinforce further self-regulation. In the presence of a self-regulatory goal, appraisal information concerning personal agency (e.g., "This was my achievement, not someone else's achievement") can be used to make positive inferences about one's progress toward self-regulation that, in turn, licenses indulgence. Thus appraisal information and the presence of self-regulatory goals is critical to how a self-conscious emotion like pride influences subsequent behavior. Implications and potential extensions in the areas of self-conscious emotions, goals, and self-regulation are discussed.

show abstract

Mood as input: People have to interpret the motivational implications of their moods.

Cited by 12 publications

References 0 publications

Untitled

Untitled

The Get Ready Mind-Set: How Gearing Up for Later Impacts Effort Allocation Now

Pride and Regulatory Behavior: The Influence of Appraisal Information and Self-Regulatory Goals

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About