2002
DOI: 10.1037/0022-006x.70.1.142
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mood disturbance fails to resolve across 31 days of cigarette abstinence in women.

Abstract: Smoking abstinence responses were characterized in 96 female smokers. Participants completed subjective state measures twice per week for 5 weeks and were then randomly assigned to a group required to abstain for 31 days or a control group that continued to smoke. Financial incentives for biochemically verified abstinence resulted in an 81% completion rate. Abstinence-related increases in depression, tension, anger, irritability, and appetite showed little tendency to return to prequit levels and remained sign… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

16
114
2
1

Year Published

2004
2004
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 98 publications
(133 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
16
114
2
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Given that neuroticism heightens negative mood states during short-term abstinence (Breslau, Kilbey, & Andreski, 1992;Gilbert et al, 1998;Gilbert et al, 2002), but typically does not have an effect on positive mood states measured by POMS vigor scores (Gilbert et al, 1998), one might expect that temporary abstinence effects could influence the present findings during the 2-hr testing period. Contrary to this supposition, however, low levels of positive affect rather than elevated negative affect influenced the relationship between neuroticism and nicotine dependence.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 69%
“…Given that neuroticism heightens negative mood states during short-term abstinence (Breslau, Kilbey, & Andreski, 1992;Gilbert et al, 1998;Gilbert et al, 2002), but typically does not have an effect on positive mood states measured by POMS vigor scores (Gilbert et al, 1998), one might expect that temporary abstinence effects could influence the present findings during the 2-hr testing period. Contrary to this supposition, however, low levels of positive affect rather than elevated negative affect influenced the relationship between neuroticism and nicotine dependence.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 69%
“…The intensity of these symptoms peaks within the first three days (Ward et al 2001) and may not resolve even after 30 days of abstinence (Gilbert et al, 2002). It is possible that these mood alterations are particularly pronounced among smokers who are high in trait anger.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Also, smokers who experience anger situations are likely to increase their smoking behaviors (Jamner et al 1999;Kalman 2002;Kenford et al 2002). However, the extent to which negative affect influences smoking behavior is highly variable between individuals and is influenced by various situational factors (Gilbert 1995;Abrams et al 1988;Gilbert et al 2002;Hughes et al 1991).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…12 There is strong evidence that nicotine reduces emotions of stress and anger because deprivation causes increases in feelings of anger and stress, despite whether they are amplified by other distressing withdrawal symptoms. 13 Several different interacting models, such as a direct effects mechanism (opioid and reward pathway models) and moderator (restoration of homeostasis model) and mediator effects [situation by trait adaptive response (STAR) model] have been investigated to explain the relation between nicotine, stress, and anger. 14 -18 Despite all the evidence concerning the relationship between smoking, anger, and stress, the effect of this relationship on relapse is not well documented.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%