1994
DOI: 10.1037/0022-3514.67.3.499
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mood, self-efficacy, and performance standards: Lower moods induce higher standards for performance.

Abstract: This research examined the effects of induced mood on personal standards for performance and judgments of one's performance capabilities, or self-efficacy judgments. In Experiment 1, standards and self-efficacy judgments were assessed on common social and academic tasks. In Experiment 2, these variables were assessed on 2 novel tasks. In both experiments, negative mood induced higher standards for performance. Induced mood had no effect on perceived self-efficacy. Negative mood Ss thus held minimal standards f… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
77
0

Year Published

1995
1995
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 119 publications
(80 citation statements)
references
References 84 publications
3
77
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In short, such research indicates that selfefficacy beliefs serve as one of the self-regulatory mechanisms that govern a person's motivation, action, and cognitive processing (Eccles & Wigfield, 2002;Pajares, 1996;Wigfield & Eccles, 2000) as well as affective processes, such as anxiety, that can hinder achievement (Bandura et al, 2003;Cervone, Kopp, Schaumann, & Scott, 1994). For example, a capable but not very confident reader might read a passage from a book aloud to her parents at home with ease and accuracy, but struggle doing so in front of the teacher and classmates.…”
Section: Academic Self-efficacy Beliefs and Achievementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In short, such research indicates that selfefficacy beliefs serve as one of the self-regulatory mechanisms that govern a person's motivation, action, and cognitive processing (Eccles & Wigfield, 2002;Pajares, 1996;Wigfield & Eccles, 2000) as well as affective processes, such as anxiety, that can hinder achievement (Bandura et al, 2003;Cervone, Kopp, Schaumann, & Scott, 1994). For example, a capable but not very confident reader might read a passage from a book aloud to her parents at home with ease and accuracy, but struggle doing so in front of the teacher and classmates.…”
Section: Academic Self-efficacy Beliefs and Achievementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the current analysis, we test whether helpless strategies are negatively linked ( Turning to goal monitoring, negative emotions, as a signal that one's goal-pursuit progress fails to meet one's expectations (Carver & Scheier, 1990), can reinforce self-defeating patterns, lower evaluations of prospective outcomes, and ultimately undermine goal achievement (e.g., Cervone, Kopp, Schaumann, & Scott, 1994;Pekrun, Goetz, Titz, & Perry, 2002). In contrast, limiting feelings of vulnerability and anxiety can facilitate achievement (Keith & Frese, 2005;Porath & Bateman, 2006).…”
Section: Cury Et Al 2006)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is possible that the relationship between affect, selfefficacy and the setting of standards may be cyclical. Negative mood may have an influence over an individual's self-efficacy and in turn have an impact on the degree to which goals for a particular task are set (Cervone, Kopp, Schaumann, & Scott, 1994), rather than standards affecting self-efficacy. The association or direction of effects between these constructs is not clear, therefore, a weakness of this study is that parenting perfectionism was only measured at one time point, making it difficult to examine another possible direction of effects.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%