2021
DOI: 10.1029/2021jc017524
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Moored Observations of the Iceland‐Scotland Overflow Plume Along the Eastern Flank of the Reykjanes Ridge

Abstract: Since 2014, an array of current meters deployed in the Iceland Basin as part of the Overturning in the Subpolar North Atlantic Program has provided new measurements of the southward flow of Iceland‐Scotland Overflow Water (ISOW) along the eastern flank of the Reykjanes Ridge. The location of the array, near 58–59°N, captures the ISOW plume at the farthest downstream location in the Iceland Basin before significant amounts of ISOW can flow into the Irminger Basin through deep fractures in the Reykjanes Ridge. T… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
24
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 63 publications
(156 reference statements)
1
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Drifters were released every 3 months from 1992 to 1994 at various depths within the ISOW layer (i.e., at depths below the 27.8 kg/m 3 isopycnal) in the two main branches of ISOW flow at the OSNAP line and their trajectories were computed backwards in time for 24 months. An upper ridge branch and a basin interior branch were identified in the observational studies by Zou et al (2017) and Johns et al (2021). Although FLAME output does not span the OSNAP observational record, sensitivity experiments show that advective pathways are representative of typical ISOW flow and should not affect our major conclusions (Gary et al, 2011).…”
Section: Flame Model Trajectoriesmentioning
confidence: 91%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Drifters were released every 3 months from 1992 to 1994 at various depths within the ISOW layer (i.e., at depths below the 27.8 kg/m 3 isopycnal) in the two main branches of ISOW flow at the OSNAP line and their trajectories were computed backwards in time for 24 months. An upper ridge branch and a basin interior branch were identified in the observational studies by Zou et al (2017) and Johns et al (2021). Although FLAME output does not span the OSNAP observational record, sensitivity experiments show that advective pathways are representative of typical ISOW flow and should not affect our major conclusions (Gary et al, 2011).…”
Section: Flame Model Trajectoriesmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Finally, we consider whether the magnitude of the ISOW freshening signal is consistent with the magnitude of the upper ocean freshening event, via the process of entrainment. Past studies show that the final ISOW product contains about 25% of entrained Subpolar Mode Water (Fogelqvist et al, 2003;Johns et al, 2021;Saunders, 1996). If entrainment of the upper ocean anomaly is the main cause of the O(0.01) PSU ISOW freshening, this would imply a salinity decline of 0.04 PSU in the Subpolar Mode Water that is entrained into the overflow.…”
Section: Salinity Signal On the Convective Pathwaymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…However, since direct measurements of the AMOC in the SPNA only commenced in 2014 (Lozier et al, 2017), the relationship between freshwater pulses on multiple time scales and AMOC strength is yet far from understood, although there is a consensus that large freshening events, such as the great salinity anomalies (Dickson et al, 1988), play a critical role in causing basin-scale ocean circulation changes (e.g., Zhang and Vallis (2006)). 2021) reports that the Iceland Scotland Overflow Waters (ISOW), a main component of the AMOC lower limb in the Subpolar North Atlantic (Johns et al, 2021;Zou et al, 2017), and which is formed in the first place in the Nordic Seas through various processes (Greenland Sea deep convection, densification on the Arctic shelves, and transformation of Atlantic-origin waters; e.g., Eldevik et al, 2009), has experienced a significant freshening in the Iceland Basin (IB) since 2017 (Figure 1). This was just after the largest upper-ocean freshening event was observed in 2016 in the upper 1000m (Figure 2a) of the eastern SPNA (Holliday et al, 2020), caused by diversion of Arctic-origin freshwater from the Labrador Current into the interior basin as a result of a reorganization of the wind-stress curl (Holliday et al, 2020; their Figure 10).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%