Moosmonitoring als Spiegel der Landnutzung?

Schröder, Winfried; Hornsmann, Inga; Pesch, Roland; Schmidt, Günther; Fränzle, Stefan; Wünschmann, Simone; Heidenreich, Heike; Markert, Bernd

doi:10.1065/uwsf2007.10.226

Cited by 6 publications

(11 citation statements)

References 40 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Moss surveys can reveal both differences in N concentrations across large distances and within small-scale areas (e.g. sitespecific differences due to canopy drip effects) [3,4,6,7]. The study at hand revealed significant differences between N concentrations measured in mosses sampled within forests and on open fields.…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 98%

“…The average value of the open sites was 7.4 kg/ha*a, the average of forest stands 26.6 kg/ha*a ( Figure 2). [7,14]. To this end, only those sites with a distance smaller than 5 km were statistically analysed.…”

Section: Canopy Drip Effectsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…For this investigation, 24 representative sampling sites within the Euro Region Nissa and 30 sampling sites within the Weser-Ems Region were selected [7,14]. Then, in 2005, within the framework of the European moss survey, N concentrations in mosses were mapped for the first time nationwide in Germany.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Therefore, this article deals with investigations on the influence of canopy drip to the concentration of nitrogen in mosses. To this end, mosses were collected within forest stands and in open fields in north-west Germany, analysed for N concentrations and compared to the data collected in 2004 [7,14] and 2005 [16]. Furthermore, the impact of different site-specific and regional factors potentially influencing N concentrations in mosses was investigated by decision trees.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Soilinhabiting ectohydric mosses thereby turned out to be particularly suitable for the inventory of elements on different spatial scales [3][4][5][6][7] since they have rhizoids serving for anchorage but not for water and mineral uptake. The application of mosses as biological samplers for dry, occult and wet atmospheric deposition has several advantages: in addition to the long-term accumulation of atmospheric deposition without physiological damages, this method is cost effective and time saving.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 4 more Smart Citations

Accounting for canopy drip effects of spatiotemporal trends of the concentrations of N in mosses, atmospheric N depositions and critical load exceedances: a case study from North-Western Germany

et al. 2013

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background: Atmospheric nitrogen (N) deposition into terrestrial ecosystems is frequently considered as a threat to phyto-diversity. In previous investigations, the atmospheric N inputs enriched in mosses were recorded in 2004 as part of a regional investigation at 54 locations in north-west Germany and in 2005 at 726 locations across the whole country. This article deals with a study conducted in 2012 comparing N concentrations in mosses sampled within 30 forest stands and in 26 adjacent open fields in north-west Germany. The N concentration in mosses were determined and, by the use of a regression model, converted to N atmospheric deposition values. These deposition estimations enabled to calculate N critical load exceedances.

show abstract

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 98%

Section: Canopy Drip Effectsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%