Moral Bio-enhancement, Freedom, Value and the Parity Principle

Pugh, Jonathan

doi:10.1007/s11245-017-9482-8

Cited by 24 publications

(7 citation statements)

References 48 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Una primera consecuencia es el dilema moral generado por el desequilibrio entre el diseño genético de la conducta de un individuo en desarrollo y la autodeterminación del mismo (Pugh, 2019;Segers y Mertes, 2020). En este supuesto existirían dos voluntades: la voluntad de los responsables de la implementación de la mejora, -por ejemplo, padres, tutores o instituciones-, y la voluntad del individuo sometido a la mejora, es decir, el hijo mejorado.…”

Section: Consecuencias éTicas Del Biomejoramientounclassified

Desafíos éticos del biomejoramiento moral

Macpherson,

Requena,

López

2023

Veritas

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

ResumenLas nuevas tecnologías biomédicas han planteado la posibilidad de intervenir en la capacidad de decisión sobre el bien y el mal, es decir, en la evaluación de la moralidad de los actos humanos. Aunque estas intervenciones (genéticas o neurológicas) no pretenden alterar la identidad del individuo, sus planteamientos no lo descartan. En consecuencia, el dilema entre terapia y mejora, en el contexto moral, adquiere especial relevancia. Aunque la terapia intentaría restaurar la capacidad individual para decidir entre el bien y el mal, la mejora biomédica plantea otros objetivos para los que es necesario abordar los fundamentos de la entidad humana, en particular algunos conceptos filosóficos como la identidad y la autonomía. Desde la filosofía moral, el desarrollo del individuo debe estructurarse fuera del campo tecnológico y abordar una perspectiva que considere el factor relacional y la existencia del otro como elemento fundamental para alcanzar la plenitud del ser humano.

show abstract

Section: Consecuencias éTicas Del Biomejoramientounclassified

Desafíos éticos del biomejoramiento moral

Macpherson,

Requena,

López

2023

Veritas

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Harris [42] argues that MBE could seriously jeopardize and restrict the freedom of the person using them. Authors [43][44][45][46] emphasize what they see as threats to human nature, dignity, and freedom as the basis for their concern about enhancement. Simkulet [47] argues that "the taking away of an agent's free will is one of the greatest harms that can befall a person".…”

Section: Factor 2-fear Of Changementioning

confidence: 99%

What drives public attitudes towards moral bioenhancement and why it matters: an exploratory study

2021

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The paper represents an empirical study of public attitudes towards moral bioenhancement. Moral bioenhancement implies the improvement of moral dispositions, i.e. an increase in the moral value of the actions or character of a moral agent. The views of bioethicists and scientists on this topic are present in the ongoing debate, but not the view of the public in general. In order to bridge the gap between the philosophical debate and the view of the public, we have examined attitudes towards moral bioenhancement. The participants were people from Serbia older than 15, who voluntarily completed an online questionnaire. The questionnaire consisted of a brief introduction to moral bioenhancement, seven general questions, 25 statements about participants’ attitudes towards moral bioenhancement, and five examples of moral dilemmas. The questionnaire also included questions which were used to reveal their preference of either deontology, or utilitarianism. Participants were asked to what degree they agree or disagree with the statements. The results showed that the means used to achieve moral enhancement, the level of education, and preference for deontology or utilitarianism do have an impact on public attitudes. Using exploratory factor analysis, we isolated four factors that appear to drive the respondents' attitudes toward moral bioenhancement, we named: general—closeness, fear of change, security, and voluntariness. Each factor in relationship to other variables offers new insights that can inform policies and give us a deeper understanding of the public attitudes. We argue that looking into different facets of attitudes towards moral bioenhancement improves the debate, and expands it.

show abstract

“…Nevertheless, this does not mean that the kind of moral bioenhancement program proposed by Persson and Savulescu poses no threat to our freedom 13 See Harris (2014) and Huang and Tsu (forthcoming). 14 For more discussions of moral particularism and moral enhancement, see Pugh (2017) and Huang and Tsu (forthcoming). and our moral agency.…”

Section: A New Moral Agency-based Critique Of Moral Bioenhancementmentioning

confidence: 99%

Moral Enhancement, Self-Governance, and Resistance

Huang

2018

The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy: A Forum for Bioethics and Philosophy of Medicine

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

John Harris recently argued that the moral bioenhancement proposed by Persson and Savulescu can damage moral agency by depriving recipients of their freedom to fall (freedom to make wrongful choices) and therefore should not be pursued. The link Harris makes between moral agency and the freedom to fall, however, implies that all forms of moral enhancement that aim to make the enhancement recipients less likely to "fall," including moral education, are detrimental to moral agency. In this article, I present a new moral agency-based critique against the moral bioenhancement program envisaged by Persson and Savulescu. I argue that the irresistible influences exerted by the bioenhancement program harm our capabilities for conducting accurate self-reflection and forming decisions that truly express our will, subsequently undermining our moral agency.

show abstract

Moral Bio-enhancement, Freedom, Value and the Parity Principle

Cited by 24 publications

References 48 publications

Desafíos éticos del biomejoramiento moral

Desafíos éticos del biomejoramiento moral

What drives public attitudes towards moral bioenhancement and why it matters: an exploratory study

Moral Enhancement, Self-Governance, and Resistance

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About