2021
DOI: 10.1111/lasr.12571
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Moral career of migrant il/legality: Undocumented male youths in New York City and Paris negotiating deportability and regularizability

Abstract: As undocumented youths transition from arrival to adolescence to adulthood, regimes of migrant il/legality shape their lives in varying ways. Over the life course, undocumented youths' legal status may also shift, creating different "careers of il/legality," sequences characterized by changes to legal status over time that re-shape self, mobility, and social roles. Longitudinal, comparative ethnographic data with undocumented male youths in Paris and New York and schools, municipal and civil society organizati… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 62 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Workplaces are subject to national‐level inspections and immigration status enforcement, which push undocumented people to work into less mainstream spaces (e.g., subcontracted work in homes) in Paris. This difference allowed New York young males to develop home‐work mobilities and play an adult breadwinner role in their families whereas Paris youths moved less and missed this adult role (Ruszczyk 2021).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Workplaces are subject to national‐level inspections and immigration status enforcement, which push undocumented people to work into less mainstream spaces (e.g., subcontracted work in homes) in Paris. This difference allowed New York young males to develop home‐work mobilities and play an adult breadwinner role in their families whereas Paris youths moved less and missed this adult role (Ruszczyk 2021).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…What exactly counts as societal inclusion and membership if legalization, as argued in Chapter 4, fails to remedy the hardships of illegality? Engage and Evade assesses deportability and regularizability (the possibilities of deportation and regularization or legalization) rather than inclusion and exclusion (see Ruszczyk, 2021). Lastly, the title conveys the core of the argument, but Asad's analysis highlights some limitations.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%