2008
DOI: 10.1093/jmp/jhm006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Moral Damage to Health Care Professionals and Trainees: Legalism and other Consequences for Patients and Colleagues

Abstract: Health care professionals' and trainees' conceptions of their responsibilities to patients can change over time for a number of reasons: evolving career goals, desires to serve different patient populations, and changing family obligations, for example. Some changes in conceptions of responsibility are healthy, but others express moral damage. Clinicians' changes in their conceptions of what they are responsible for express moral damage when their responses to others express a meager, rather than robust, sense… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Moral distress happens to a clinician when she is motivated by good reasons to do some action, but barred (by parental refusal in the case of vaccines) from acting as she is motivated to act. 10 All of these sources of frustration are worth canvassing, but we must also consider that physicians' responses to frustration, whatever the sources, are probably just as influential during clinical encounters as families' anti-intellectual mistrust, ill-founded or unusual beliefs, or unreasonable behaviors. Even when families' concerns are ill-informed, they should be recognized by clinicians as important when they come from parents' impulses to protect their child.…”
Section: Review Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moral distress happens to a clinician when she is motivated by good reasons to do some action, but barred (by parental refusal in the case of vaccines) from acting as she is motivated to act. 10 All of these sources of frustration are worth canvassing, but we must also consider that physicians' responses to frustration, whatever the sources, are probably just as influential during clinical encounters as families' anti-intellectual mistrust, ill-founded or unusual beliefs, or unreasonable behaviors. Even when families' concerns are ill-informed, they should be recognized by clinicians as important when they come from parents' impulses to protect their child.…”
Section: Review Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Implement programs focusing on clinicians' practices of clinical moral perception (26,27) to help caregivers resist viewing patients with mental illness as"difficult" and to help caregivers maintain compassionate views toward patients.…”
Section: Healthcare Organization Leadership and Managementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…chronic or terminal conditions, or time and resource constraints that make it difficult to adequately address patients' needs. 14,15 Interestingly, when practitioners reflexively respond to these constraints by making callous jokes, moral distress can be intensified or even increased, especially when practitioners are aware that they are responding callously to others. 14 In what follows, we explore what happens when jokes don't bring people together but instead distance health care professionals from patients, from colleagues, and from their own feelings of vulnerability.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…14,15 Interestingly, when practitioners reflexively respond to these constraints by making callous jokes, moral distress can be intensified or even increased, especially when practitioners are aware that they are responding callously to others. 14 In what follows, we explore what happens when jokes don't bring people together but instead distance health care professionals from patients, from colleagues, and from their own feelings of vulnerability. Drawing on our experiences in medical education and end-of-life care, we specifically focus on how we might respond to a colleague who uses callous humor in a way that undermines compassionate care.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%