2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2012.02.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Moral dilemmas in cognitive neuroscience of moral decision-making: A principled review

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
236
2
16

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 239 publications
(260 citation statements)
references
References 95 publications
6
236
2
16
Order By: Relevance
“…Second, there is significant within-type variability. For instance, a perceived personal distance [64] in a certain dilemma could significantly differ from another dilemma of the same type, and it could increase within-type variability. Finally, some moral psychologists have contended that because these dilemmas are not realistic, but hypothetical, and contain extreme situations it would be difficult to properly investigate participants' moral thinking in their real, everyday lives using them (e.g., [65]).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Second, there is significant within-type variability. For instance, a perceived personal distance [64] in a certain dilemma could significantly differ from another dilemma of the same type, and it could increase within-type variability. Finally, some moral psychologists have contended that because these dilemmas are not realistic, but hypothetical, and contain extreme situations it would be difficult to properly investigate participants' moral thinking in their real, everyday lives using them (e.g., [65]).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, the present study utilized hypothetical dilemmas instead of real life situations [145]. Due to this reason, the present study would not be able to explain the actual psychological processes linked to moral dilemma solving and moral behavior in one's everyday life.…”
Section: Limitations and Future Directionsmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…First, we have to take into account that the majority of previous neuroimaging studies examining human morality have utilized hypothetical moral dilemmas instead of real problems (Christensen and Gomila 2012). If we do not seriously consider how to employ realistic dilemmas that can be implemented in neuroimaging settings, we cannot properly investigate the neural correlates of moral virtue and character because the development of moral virtue and character can only be completely evaluated if we investigate all of moral reasoning, moral affection, moral motivation, and moral behaviour (Curren and Kotzee 2014;Fowers 2014).…”
Section: Limitations and Future Directionsmentioning
confidence: 99%