2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.avb.2015.01.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Moral disengagement as a self-regulatory process in sexual harassment perpetration at work: A preliminary conceptualization

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
52
0
6

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 52 publications
(61 citation statements)
references
References 106 publications
(204 reference statements)
3
52
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…Both male and female participants dehumanized the sexually objectified women, rating them as less intelligent and less agentic than non-sexually objectified targets. These findings support the evidence that empathy is undermined when the target is dehumanized and seen more as an object than as a complete human being experiencing feelings and concerns (Čehajić et al 2009; see also Page and Pina 2015).…”
Section: Sexually Objectifying Media → Disruption Of Emphatic Resonancesupporting
confidence: 78%
“…Both male and female participants dehumanized the sexually objectified women, rating them as less intelligent and less agentic than non-sexually objectified targets. These findings support the evidence that empathy is undermined when the target is dehumanized and seen more as an object than as a complete human being experiencing feelings and concerns (Čehajić et al 2009; see also Page and Pina 2015).…”
Section: Sexually Objectifying Media → Disruption Of Emphatic Resonancesupporting
confidence: 78%
“…Other predictors of cyberaggression, such as moral disengagement (Page & Pina, 2015;Page, Pina, & Giner-Sorolla, in press;Pornari & Wood, 2010), hostile attribution bias (Pornari & Wood, 2010), and perceptions of anonymity (Barlett, 2015;Ritter, 2014;Wright & Li, 2013) may also explain harassment in online games. Research investigating online hostility should take into account trait and other individual predictors that contribute to aggression.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The positive association between cyberaggression and moral disengagement has been demonstrated in a variety of cultural contexts, including samples of Australian (Robson & Witenberg, 2013), German (Perren & Sticca, 2011;Wachs, 2012), Chinese (Wang et al, 2016(Wang et al, , 2017, Italian (Renati et al, 2012), and American (Meter et al, 2020;Meter & Bauman, 2018) adolescents and young adults. In the context of sexual violence, moral disengagement could be employed as a cognitive defense employed by perpetrators to exonerate their actions while blaming the victim, a process that could be highlighted by the acceptance of rape myths (Bandura, 1990;Page & Pina, 2015). The empirical or theoretical application of moral disengagement on explaining sexual violence may be limited (Page et al, 2016;Page & Pina, 2015).…”
Section: Theoretical Understanding Of Ibsamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the context of sexual violence, moral disengagement could be employed as a cognitive defense employed by perpetrators to exonerate their actions while blaming the victim, a process that could be highlighted by the acceptance of rape myths (Bandura, 1990;Page & Pina, 2015). The empirical or theoretical application of moral disengagement on explaining sexual violence may be limited (Page et al, 2016;Page & Pina, 2015). That being said, moral disengagement offers a promising framework to promote a better understanding of the cognitive processes that facilitate the perpetration and perpetuation of sexual violence (Page & Pina, 2015).…”
Section: Theoretical Understanding Of Ibsamentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation