2022
DOI: 10.1080/15265161.2022.2044544
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Moral Distress: What Are We Measuring?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
3

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 69 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, there is a certain consensus that “illegitimate constraints on individuals’ moral agency” constitute a hallmark of moral distress. Unfortunately, existing measurement tools cannot determine with certainty, whether the assessed subjective feeling of moral distress results from such an illegitimate constraint, and whether the distress experienced is correctly classified as moral (Kolbe and Melo-Martin 2022 ). Therefore, those tools do not allow a reliable normative judgment about the action(s) of a person.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, there is a certain consensus that “illegitimate constraints on individuals’ moral agency” constitute a hallmark of moral distress. Unfortunately, existing measurement tools cannot determine with certainty, whether the assessed subjective feeling of moral distress results from such an illegitimate constraint, and whether the distress experienced is correctly classified as moral (Kolbe and Melo-Martin 2022 ). Therefore, those tools do not allow a reliable normative judgment about the action(s) of a person.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, from a dialogical ethics point of view, subjective moral intuitions of stakeholders can be considered as relevant information and contribution to solving ethical issues (Abma et al 2009 ). Furthermore, considering the negative impact moral distress can have on mental health and job satisfaction of healthcare workers, subjectively experienced moral distress might be of relevance regardless of its cause or normative evaluation (Kolbe and de Melo Martin 2022 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another weakness is that the scope of this study is limited by its design, as the correlational nature of this study precludes causal inferences. Moreover, the MDS‐R itself has attracted criticism, despite its widespread popularity 37 . While Kolbe & de Melo‐Martin 37 argue that the instrument overestimates moral distress, it is important to bear in mind that even the opposite is possible.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, the MDS‐R itself has attracted criticism, despite its widespread popularity 37 . While Kolbe & de Melo‐Martin 37 argue that the instrument overestimates moral distress, it is important to bear in mind that even the opposite is possible. Isolated situations generate only low MDS‐R scores due to the low frequencies, but they can nevertheless be extremely morally distressing when they do happen, and cause intention to leave or result in sick leave.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation