2015
DOI: 10.1159/000435926
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Moral Identity and Developmental Theory

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

1
14
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2,457 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
1
14
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…A distinction between the development of moral identity across the lifespan and the emergence of moral identity in the first instance must be noted. With researchers only recently turning their attention to the question of how a person's moral identity might change over their lifetime (e.g., Krettenauer & Hertz, ; Lapsley, ; Proulx & Chandler, ), it is important to be clear that in this review, we are concerned exclusively with the question of moral identity emergence in the first instance.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A distinction between the development of moral identity across the lifespan and the emergence of moral identity in the first instance must be noted. With researchers only recently turning their attention to the question of how a person's moral identity might change over their lifetime (e.g., Krettenauer & Hertz, ; Lapsley, ; Proulx & Chandler, ), it is important to be clear that in this review, we are concerned exclusively with the question of moral identity emergence in the first instance.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The nature of this link has been described in various ways. For instance, some propose that the moral self is an ‘earlier and less mature form’ of adolescent moral identity (Krettenauer & Hertz, , p. 143), while others suggest it may be the ‘precursor’ (Hardy & Carlo, ) or ‘developmental source’ (Lapsley, , p. 168) of mature moral identity. Characterizing the link between the moral self of early childhood and moral identity in adolescence in this way invokes a long‐standing debate about whether child development across various domains (e.g., moral, social, and numbers and logic) proceeds in a gradual, additive, and continuous manner, or whether development proceeds by virtue of abrupt, discontinuous, and qualitatively distinct changes (for a review, see Lerner, ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unlike other personality impressions, moral character impressions reflect a fundamental evaluation of a person’s goodness or badness, meaning that self-other disagreement about one’s moral character represents a disagreement about one’s fundamental nature (Lapsley, 2015; Strohminger & Nichols, 2014). As such, failing to see eye to eye with others about one’s moral character should have a robust association with negative interpersonal outcomes, above and beyond disagreement about personality traits.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Özgecilik ve bileşenleri genellikle kişinin insani değerleri ve ahlaki yönü ile irtibatlandırılır (FitzPatrick, 2017). Bireyin kimliği ile ahlaki derinliği arasında ilişki olduğu fikri de psikolojide köklü bir geçmişe sahiptir (Lapsley, 2015). Bu bağlamda Damion ve Hart (1992), bireyin ahlaki kimliğinin ahlaki ilkelere uygun davranış sergilemede güçlü bir etken olduğunu vurgulamıştır.…”
Section: Introductionunclassified