2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.rceng.2021.05.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Morbidity and mortality in elderly patients with heart failure managed with a comprehensive care model vs. usual care: The UMIPIC program

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
7
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
1
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Most of them have HFpEF (>50%). This profile is similar to the one identified in other studies developed in Spain and different HF units [ 14 , 16 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 ].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Most of them have HFpEF (>50%). This profile is similar to the one identified in other studies developed in Spain and different HF units [ 14 , 16 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 ].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…The following paper presents a study carried out in a Heart Failure Unit, included in the UMIPIC program of the Spanish Society of Internal Medicine, based on the comprehensive care of elderly patients with HF and other comorbidities [ 14 , 15 , 16 ]. This program, made for managing patients with HF and other comorbidities, is extended throughout Spain.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This finding seems relevant to us in the sense that many decompensations are treated as outpatients, thus preventing the patient from going to the emergency room and ending up being admitted to hospital. However, we found a greater proportion of patients with left ventricular systolic dysfunction compared with the UMIPIC population [ 26 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A sample size of 152 patients was estimated (76 patients in each arm). Based on previous Spanish studies [ 26 ], we considered an incidence of 43% for the combined variable in the SOC group versus 20% in the LUS-guided treatment group with a statistical power of 90% (ß = 0.10), an expected drop-out rate of 10% and a level of significance ∞ = 0.05 bilaterally.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%