2002
DOI: 10.1590/s0103-90162002000400025
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

More adequate probability distributions to represent the saturated soil hydraulic conductivity

Abstract: The saturated soil hydraulic conductivity (Ksat) is one of the most relevant variables in studies of water and solute movement in the soil. Its determination in the laboratory and in the field yields high dispersion results, which could be an indication that this variable has a no symmetrical distribution. Adjustment of the normal, lognormal, gamma and beta distributions were examined in order to search for a probability were density function that would more adequately describe the distribution of this variabl… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
11
0
4

Year Published

2007
2007
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
1
11
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Additionally, robust statistical techniques were used for the quantification of experimental errors (Zacharias et al, 1996;Mesquita et al, 2002), i.e. techniques that do not require normal data distribution, except for equations (13) and (14) ( Table 2).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Additionally, robust statistical techniques were used for the quantification of experimental errors (Zacharias et al, 1996;Mesquita et al, 2002), i.e. techniques that do not require normal data distribution, except for equations (13) and (14) ( Table 2).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This indicates that not all experimental observations were symmetrically distributed around these statistical indexes, which probably requires prior data transformation so that results can be analyzed and interpreted correctly (Mesquita et al, 2002). The Kolmogorov-Smirnov test was applied to verify normal residual distribution of variance analysis, where the need for logarithmic data transformation to stabilize the treatment variances and tailor them to parametric statistical tests was confirmed (McIntyre & Tanner, 1959;Logsdon & Jaynes, 1996;Mesquita et al, 2002).…”
Section: Aggregate Tensile Strengthmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Whether conductivities can reasonably be assumed lognormal is a regular topic of investigation: the distribution in a sandstone formation, for example, varied with the part sampled [18], while a soil investigation concluded the lognormal distribution fit the data better than a gamma distribution [59]. Although the validity of using Gaussian fields to describe log-conductivities remains open to question [27], we adopt the hypothesis here because it is convenient for calculation and has commonly been assumed [82].…”
Section: Further Specificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the standard simplex with vertices defined by the origin and standard basis vectors, one considers vectors ζ ≡ (z ω 1 , z ω 2 , ⋯ , z ω e ) of non-negative integers satisfying |ζ| ≤ d and takes as knots the points with spatial coordinates n ζ ≡ ζ/d. The corresponding interpolatory polynomials are defined by (59) If instead, one dilates the standard simplex by the factor d, the knots coincide with the vectors ζ and the polynomials become p ζ (ω/d). Carnicer et al [12] have obtained error estimates for such interpolations.…”
Section: Nicolaides Interpolationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Há referências na literatura mostrando que os valores de condutividade hidráulica saturada em uma área específica podem ser muito distintos, assumindo grande amplitude total e elevados coeficientes de variação (BREJDA et al, 2000;COOKE et al, 1995;COOLEY, 1999;HANN & ZHANG, 1996;KUTILEK & NIELSEN, 1994;MESQUITA, 2001;MESQUITA et al, 2002;MOURA et al, 1999;PAZ et al, 1996;SMESRUD & SELKER, 2001;WARRICK & NIELSEN, 1980). Isto pode ser um indicativo de que a propriedade não é representada por uma distribuição de probabilidade simétrica e, portanto nem sempre a média e/ou mediana podem ser assumidas como valores representativos de toda a área.…”
Section: Introductionunclassified