More on the consequences of being accused of malpractice.

Abstract

Letters display parametersof the monitor arethe limit imageswere reviewedat the workstationand 50 different images were reviewed on hard copy by sevenphysicians,only three of whom were board-certified radiologists. Gillard have not addressed is the problem of older comparisonfilms when reviewingtheir inpatients onthemonitor.On the basisof our experience,we disagree with Drs. Harrison and Gillard's findings. We will proceed toward our goal but do so by im proving the monitor qualities to match those of filmed images.The Fuji quality assurance workstationsare helpful but should not be usedasthefinal interpretation station.