More than the Sum of Its Parts: Donor-Sponsored Cash-for-Work Programmes and Social Cohesion in Jordanian Communities Hosting Syrian Refugees

Abstract

Cash-for-Work (CfW)/public works programmes have gained great interest recently because they can deliver employment and income for vulnerable households, in addition to dearly needed infrastructure. Studying donor-funded CfW programmes for Syrian refugees and their local neighbours in Jordan we show that CfW can also improve social cohesion, which is particularly important in the context of state fragility and migration. The studied programmes strengthen the sense of belonging and horizontal trust of participants and non-participants, refugees and locals, and in particular women. Their effect on vertical trust, however, is more ambiguous because many Syrians and Jordanians attribute positive effects to donor support rather than to Jordanian authorities. We use a mixed method approach including semi-structured interviews with 390 CfW participants, other community members and neutral observers and a quantitative analysis of a survey covering all 1847 participants of one CfW programme.

The moderating role of neighborhood social cohesion in the mediation effects of the loneliness between acculturation stress and post-traumatic growth among female North Korean defectors

“…Increasing the level of neighborhood social cohesion emerged as a key strategy to improve several dimensions of refugee life through improving daily activities, psychological states, and other health-related indicators 35 , 56 . To advance neighborhood social cohesion, the cooperation of community resources, informal networks, and multidisciplinary expert groups including psychiatry, nursing, and psychology is required 57 . In particular, based on understanding the characteristics of the original community culture, establishing a direct social network through multidisciplinary cooperation was identified as an important step in building community for new refugees in Canada 58 .…”

Forward-Thinking for Sustainable Shared Mobility Solutions in Amman

“…From the analysis, a variety of challenges, including regulatory restrictions, infrastructure constraints, and cultural attitudes can be expected. From a regulatory standpoint, Jordan's legal framework for shared mobility services is in its infancy, and certain legal provisions may unintentionally impede the expansion of such services [31]. For instance, current transportation laws may not adequately recognize or provide for shared mobility, creating uncertainty for service providers and consumers [32].…”

How humanitarian–development responses may discriminate by nationality: Refugee and migrant inclusion following the 2016 Jordan Compact

“…As of October 2022, work permits issued under these programmes are exclusive to Syrians and cannot be obtained for other groups. Thus, while cash‐for‐work became more substantive and eventually became legal work opportunities, including social security subscriptions, these changes—and their implications for development—were restricted to Syrians and vulnerable Jordanians (Ministry of Labour, 2022b; Zintl & Loewe, 2022). It is in such restrictions that development aid and labour were intertwined for non‐Syrian refugees, despite their broad exclusion from both of these mechanisms.…”