2013
DOI: 10.1177/0023830913484891
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

More than Words: The Effect of Multi-word Frequency and Constituency on Phonetic Duration

Abstract: There is mounting evidence that language users are sensitive to the distributional properties of multi-word sequences. Such findings expand the range of information speakers are sensitive to and call for processing models that can represent larger chains of relations. In the current paper we investigate the effect of multi-word statistics on phonetic duration using a combination of experimental and corpus-based research. We ask (a) if phonetic duration is affected by multi-word frequency in both elicited and s… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

10
117
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 148 publications
(128 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
10
117
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The line of research on phonetics-lexicon interactions is important to acknowledge, as it potentially offers a way of reconciling apparently non-modular effects with a modular analysis. We know that lexical factors, such as neighbourhood size, frequency, or lexical predictability, influence continuous phonetic dimensions, such as for instance VOT, segmental duration, or degree of coarticulation (Munson & Solomon, 2004;Scarborough, 2004;Baese-Berk & Goldrick, 2009;Arnon & Cohen Priva, 2013;Cohen Priva, 2015). These findings have not led to a unanimous rejection of modular processing, as some psycholinguistic models have the capacity to capture such gradient phonetic effects using simultaneous activation of multiple categories.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The line of research on phonetics-lexicon interactions is important to acknowledge, as it potentially offers a way of reconciling apparently non-modular effects with a modular analysis. We know that lexical factors, such as neighbourhood size, frequency, or lexical predictability, influence continuous phonetic dimensions, such as for instance VOT, segmental duration, or degree of coarticulation (Munson & Solomon, 2004;Scarborough, 2004;Baese-Berk & Goldrick, 2009;Arnon & Cohen Priva, 2013;Cohen Priva, 2015). These findings have not led to a unanimous rejection of modular processing, as some psycholinguistic models have the capacity to capture such gradient phonetic effects using simultaneous activation of multiple categories.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sprenger and van Rijn (2013) replicated this effect in the production of Dutch expressions for time. Arnon and Cohen Priva (2013) found reduced phonetic durations for higher frequency n-grams and Shaoul, Westbury, and found evidence for n-gram probability effects in subjective frequency tasks 1 .…”
Section: Cloze Normsmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…(e.g. Arnon & Priva, 2013;Arnon & Snider, 2010;Tremblay, Derwing, Libben, & Westbury, 2011). Frequency effect on the comprehension and production of formulaic sequences has been detected in L1 research, but little research has explored online processing of formulaic sequences except for idioms in L2.…”
Section: Formulaic Sequences In Second Language Learning Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%