1997
DOI: 10.1016/s0141-1187(97)00023-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Morison wave force coefficients for application to random seas

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This was the inevitable result of the delicate clamping mechanism used to hold the dropper lines in place, and the difficulty to apply vertical pretension, as a toolarge pretension would have resulted in excessive mussel drop-off. Due to that relative horizontal motion of the dropper lines, further enhancement of the evaluation method is required for a more precise estimation of drag coefficients, but more importantly of inertia coefficients, C M [51,52], which will be presented in an upcoming publication. As the relative motion, and thus relative velocity of the fluid field driving the force response is decreased through the elastic behavior of the dropper lines, differences in force coefficients, as well as measured force peaks, are expected; however, the determination of the maximum deflection amplitude was not determined as optical access in the Large Wave Flume and is greatly reduced through suspended sediments.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This was the inevitable result of the delicate clamping mechanism used to hold the dropper lines in place, and the difficulty to apply vertical pretension, as a toolarge pretension would have resulted in excessive mussel drop-off. Due to that relative horizontal motion of the dropper lines, further enhancement of the evaluation method is required for a more precise estimation of drag coefficients, but more importantly of inertia coefficients, C M [51,52], which will be presented in an upcoming publication. As the relative motion, and thus relative velocity of the fluid field driving the force response is decreased through the elastic behavior of the dropper lines, differences in force coefficients, as well as measured force peaks, are expected; however, the determination of the maximum deflection amplitude was not determined as optical access in the Large Wave Flume and is greatly reduced through suspended sediments.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The function F is given by 4 † We could reproduce Mansard's surface elevation formula (7) (reference 9), but not the formulas for speed and acceleration, equations (13) and (14), which do not seem to revert to the Stokes second-order solution for a single wave.…”
Section: Appendix C: Tma Correctionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Journee and Massie [23] and Sarpkay and Isaacson [24] proposed various methods to define the drag and inertia coefficients for better estimation of the solution to the Morison equation. Burrows et al [25] also defined several techniques, such as least square, cross-spectral, and the methods of moments, to identify these coefficients, and subsequently measured the wave loads using the Morison equation to prove the accuracy of predicting random forces using the equation. The measured data were later shown to sufficiently match the predicted values, which confirmed the suitability of the equation for measuring wave loads.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%