In their study, Gavin et al 1 examined whether differences occur in the blood pressure (BP) morning surge (MS) between 199 black and 207 white participants of the Sympathetic Activity and ambulatory Blood Pressure in Africans (SABPA) Study. The authors documented a higher ambulatory BP and a lower rate of BP rise at awakening in black vs white Africans.An increased MS, ascertained using ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM), has been found to be associated with an increased risk of stroke and other cardiovascular events. 2 However, the strength of the association between the MS and cardiovascular events is largely dependent on the definition and threshold used to define the MS and of the patients' characteristics, with one study also reporting a significant association for a blunted MS. 3 Few studies have also reported substantial ethnic differences in the degree of MS, a finding which can help understand the role of ethnic factors in cardiovascular risk assessment and identify the most effective measures to be implemented for preventing BP-related cardiovascular events (Table 1). [4][5][6] According to these studies, including both normotensive and hypertensive subjects, the amplitude of BP rise at awakening is highest in Asians and lowest in blacks. One longitudinal study, based on mixed populations from Europe, Asia, and South America, anticipated some potential differences in the risk of cardiovascular events according to the ethnic group. 7At variance from the majority of previous studies, in the study of Gavin et al the MS determination was based on the pattern of the changes in BP independent of waking, following a methodology which previously proved to be more reliable for the prediction of risk than the traditional sleep-trough approach. 8 This methodology relies upon a line of best fit based on the entire recording and can independently estimate the power of the MS and the rate of the morning rise during the transition period, making no assumption about when the BP is rising. This is relevant since the calculation of MS bears several unsolved and critical issues, particularly related to the methodology used for its calculation, as summarized in Table 2. [9][10][11] Although the major strength of the study by Gavin et al stands in the rigorous methodology employed to assess the MS, nonetheless the study is not free of some critical issues. First, the ABPM was performed in the Research Unit facility. Although the authors observed no difference in the proportion of participants reporting insomnia, they did not address the quality of sleep, which may have differed from that reported when sleeping in a cozier environment as that of their home. A worse quality of sleep may have contributed to rise the average level of nighttime BP and to reduce the amplitude of the MS. Second, although the authors did not find any association between antihypertensive medication use and the rate and power of the MS, they did not specifically evaluate the number of drugs used and, most importantly, the timing of their adm...