2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.jslw.2021.100791
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Moroccan immigrants learning Spanish writing (compared with L1 children)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
1
0
1

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
1
1
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…These results add up to existing evidence on the important role of linguistic distance in predicting immigrants' language outcomes-as assessed either with selfreports (Dustmann, 1994;Isphording & Otten, 2011 or with certification exams (Van der Slik, 2010)-and suggest that linguistic proximity confers a significant advantage when it comes to L2 writing in a newly learned language by immigrants. Education level had an additive effect, which is in line with the assumption that low-literate adult immigrant learners progress more slowly in L2 acquisition (Kurvers et al, 2006;Young-Scholten 2006) and corroborates previous findings on the role of L1 literacy in L2 writing (Gonzalves, 2021;Kurvers, 2015;Manjón-Cabeza Cruz & Sosiński, 2021). These results are consistent with Kojima et al's (2022) meta-analysis of the external correlates of L2 writing, which revealed that L1 writing skills explain a considerable amount of the variability in L2 writing performance.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These results add up to existing evidence on the important role of linguistic distance in predicting immigrants' language outcomes-as assessed either with selfreports (Dustmann, 1994;Isphording & Otten, 2011 or with certification exams (Van der Slik, 2010)-and suggest that linguistic proximity confers a significant advantage when it comes to L2 writing in a newly learned language by immigrants. Education level had an additive effect, which is in line with the assumption that low-literate adult immigrant learners progress more slowly in L2 acquisition (Kurvers et al, 2006;Young-Scholten 2006) and corroborates previous findings on the role of L1 literacy in L2 writing (Gonzalves, 2021;Kurvers, 2015;Manjón-Cabeza Cruz & Sosiński, 2021). These results are consistent with Kojima et al's (2022) meta-analysis of the external correlates of L2 writing, which revealed that L1 writing skills explain a considerable amount of the variability in L2 writing performance.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…It could even be seen as an indication of progress. Thus, we share Manjón-Cabeza Cruz and Sosiński’s (2021) opinion that deviances from the standard should be seen as “a starting point for improvement” rather than as errors, and we agree with Haswell (1988) that “Writing errors may be not so much mistakes as mis-takes, or missteps, inevitable in traversing new ground, not so much stubbornness—fossils of previous more ignorant learning stages in need of clearing away to allow subsequent progress—as stumbles, wrong turns made when new tactics are attempted” (p. 482). It is also important to stress that writing is a recursive process, and lack of time pressure and anxiety—which are typical of language testing conditions—would have probably helped our participants go through further stages of editing or rewriting to improve the quality of their texts.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…I några studier har mer specifikt skrivutvecklingen hos vuxna andraspråksinlärare undersökts (Gonzalves, 2023;Kurvers & Ketelaars, 2011;Manjón-Cabeza Cruz & Sosiński, 2021)…”
Section: Grundläggande Skriftspråksutveckling Hos Individenunclassified