2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.pbb.2005.01.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Morphine preexposure facilitates morphine place preference and attenuates morphine taste aversion

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

7
51
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 86 publications
(65 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
7
51
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, morphine place preference was increased in postdependent rats, as compared with the previous test and non-dependent rats, after they were re-conditioned for morphine CPP in the abstinent state (following 6-8 weeks of abstinence). Previous animal studies found that preexposure to morphine or cocaine increases subsequent place preference for those drugs (Gaiardi et al, 1991;Aston-Jones, 2001, 2003a;Harris et al, 2007b;Lett, 1989;Shippenberg and Heidbreder, 1995;Shippenberg et al, 1996;Simpson and Riley, 2005). However, the current results extend those studies by showing that enhanced morphine preference during protracted abstinence is dependent upon experiencing drug-cue pairings specifically in the abstinent state, indicating an important role of incentive learning for Pavlovian-conditioned responses.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 62%
“…However, morphine place preference was increased in postdependent rats, as compared with the previous test and non-dependent rats, after they were re-conditioned for morphine CPP in the abstinent state (following 6-8 weeks of abstinence). Previous animal studies found that preexposure to morphine or cocaine increases subsequent place preference for those drugs (Gaiardi et al, 1991;Aston-Jones, 2001, 2003a;Harris et al, 2007b;Lett, 1989;Shippenberg and Heidbreder, 1995;Shippenberg et al, 1996;Simpson and Riley, 2005). However, the current results extend those studies by showing that enhanced morphine preference during protracted abstinence is dependent upon experiencing drug-cue pairings specifically in the abstinent state, indicating an important role of incentive learning for Pavlovian-conditioned responses.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 62%
“…While sensitization and conditioned place preference are generally considered separate phenomena, pre-treated or sensitized animals do show significantly enhanced CPP relative to control animals (Lett, 1989;Shippenberg and Heidbreder, 1995;Simpson and Riley, 2005). Interestingly, we have previously shown pre-treatment with cocaine results in enhanced longterm potentiation (LTP), an affect which could be expected to enhance learned associations such as those involved in CPP (Thompson et al, 2002).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previously sensitized animals exhibit significantly enhanced conditioned place preference (CPP) relative to control animals (Lett, 1989;Shippenberg and Heidbreder, 1995;Simpson and Riley, 2005). Place conditioning typically involves repeatedly pairing a compartment with a specific stimulus while pairing a separate distinct compartment with a neutral stimulus.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As drug abuse potential can be envisaged as a balance between rewarding and aversive effects (Hutchison and Riley, 2008;Simpson and Riley, 2005;Wise et al, 1976), it can be hypothesized that the components of the appetitive properties of addicting drugs might result from both direct activation of neural reward pathways and suppression of responses in neural circuits mediating aversion. Indeed, one of the hallmarks of drug addiction is the perseverance of drug taking despite of negative and unpleasant consequences of drug use.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%