A n institutional repository, as both a software platform and a set of services, collects, organizes, preserves, and disseminates the digital output of an institution. The method of populating an institutional repository or adding digital content and associated metadata, varies by repository. Repositories may employ one or more deposit methods depending on their archiving and collection policies, the communities they serve, and repository staffing levels and resources. Deposit methods can include unmediated author (or his or her proxy) self-archiving, author (or his or her proxy) self-archiving mediated by repository staff, repository staff archiving on behalf of authors, and automated batch loading performed by repository staff. Institutional repositories also vary in their selection policies and, particularly in the United States, collections in institutional repositories represent a wide range of born digital and digitized material beyond peer-reviewed articles and electronic theses and dissertations.1 As more scholarship is produced digitally and the cultural and intellectual resources of institutions are digitized, institutional repositories are seeing an ever-expanding source of content. In cases where this material is added to institutional repositories by repository or library staff and not by authors, the opportunity for an increasing flow of content is accompanied by the challenge of the metadata creation required to make that content accessible.One way to address the challenge of creating metadata for institutional repositories is to repurpose (reuse) existing Machine-Readable Cataloging (MARC) metadata. Libraries have a wealth of descriptive metadata encoded in the MARC format in their library catalogs. Taking advantage of this robust legacy metadata and extending its semantic and descriptive value into new discovery environments and formats is an essential component of successful metadata management in today's heterogeneous metadata environment.2 Repurposing library catalog metadata is 34 Walsh LRTS 55 (1) has not been discussed in the literature.11