Handbook of Formal Languages 1997
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-59136-5_7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Morphisms

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
26
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2006
2006

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
0
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…See [9] for a general overview of morphisms. An involution θ : X −→ X is defined as a map such that θ 2 is the identity function.…”
Section: Formal Language Prerequisitesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…See [9] for a general overview of morphisms. An involution θ : X −→ X is defined as a map such that θ 2 is the identity function.…”
Section: Formal Language Prerequisitesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The main reason is that a direct product of two free monoids has a faithful representation in the multiplicative semigroup N 3×3 (which extends naturally that of a free monoid in the multiplicative semigroup of N 2×2 ). This allows us to encode Post Correspondence Problem and therefore to establish the undecidabibility of certain problems, see [16], also [11], [3] or [8]. E., g., the freeness of the subsemigroup of a finite number of matrices can be shown to be undecidable when one observes that the "uniquely decipherability property" in A * × B * is undecidable, [5].…”
Section: Preliminariesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For undecidability, we show that there exists a regular set of trajectories S such that determining whether context-free languages are shp Σ (S, θ )-free for morphic or antimorphic involutions is impossible. The following results employ the undecidability of Post's Correspondence Problem (PCP); we refer the reader to Harju and Karhumäki [8] for an introduction. Theorem 6.2.…”
Section: Decidabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%