2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.coastaleng.2011.03.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Morphodynamic upscaling with the MORFAC approach: Dependencies and sensitivities

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

5
81
0
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 125 publications
(100 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
5
81
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…As in the unidirectional flow case presented by Ranasinghe et al (2011), there exists an inverse proportionality relationship between the critical MORFAC and Fr. However, the value of the allowable critical morphological acceleration is more than an order of magnitude smaller than in the case of unidirectional flow, e.g.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…As in the unidirectional flow case presented by Ranasinghe et al (2011), there exists an inverse proportionality relationship between the critical MORFAC and Fr. However, the value of the allowable critical morphological acceleration is more than an order of magnitude smaller than in the case of unidirectional flow, e.g.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Although in complicated situations, simulations with a BSS of 0.5 are considered to be sufficiently accurate (Van Rijn et al, 2003), in this idealized case a BSS of 0.99 is adopted as cut-off for the lowest MORFAC value at which model results started to depart from the benchmark case (Ranasinghe et al, 2011). As in Ranasinghe et al (2011), the flow velocity, grid size, hydrodynamic time step, and the MORFAC were varied systematically to investigate the dependencies and sensitivities of model predictions to these variables.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations