Despite their close phylogenetic relationship, natural intertypic reassortants between influenza A (FluA) and B (FluB) viruses have not been described. Inefficient polymerase assembly of the three polymerase subunits may contribute to this incompatibility, especially because the known protein-protein interaction domains, including the PA-binding domain of PB1, are highly conserved for each virus type. Here we show that substitution of the FluA PA-binding domain (PB1-A 1-25 ) with that of FluB (PB1-B 1-25 ) is accompanied by reduced polymerase activity and viral growth of FluA. Consistent with these findings, surface plasmon resonance spectroscopy measurements revealed that PA of FluA exhibits impaired affinity to biotinylated PB1-B 1-25 peptides. PA of FluB showed no detectable affinity to biotinylated PB1-A 1-25 peptides. Consequently, FluB PB1 harboring the PA-binding domain of FluA (PB1-AB) failed to assemble with PA and PB2 into an active polymerase complex. To regain functionality, we used a single amino acid substitution (T6Y) known to confer binding to PA of both virus types, which restored polymerase complex formation but surprisingly not polymerase activity for FluB. Taken together, our results demonstrate that the conserved virus type-specific PA-binding domains differ in their affinity to PA and thus might contribute to intertypic exclusion of reassortants between FluA and FluB viruses.Influenza A and B viruses are closely related RNA viruses that cause respiratory disease. Although influenza A viruses (FluA) infect both humans and a broad variety of animals, influenza B viruses (FluB) are predominantly restricted to humans (1). Both viruses co-circulate in the human population and cause significant morbidity and mortality. Although FluB viruses usually show a lower prevalence of human infections, in some influenza seasons, they account for the majority of cases (1-4).Correct assembly of the heterotrimeric polymerase complex consisting of the subunits PA, PB1, and PB2 is essential for transcription and replication of influenza viruses in the nucleus of infected cells. Direct biochemical interactions have been shown for PB1 and PB2 as well as for PA and PB1 (5-9), whereas a weak transient interaction has been proposed for PA and PB2 (10). For FluA, it was demonstrated that PB1 possesses the RNA polymerization activity, whereas PB2 is able to bind specifically to host-derived capped mRNA, which is subsequently cleaved off by the PA endonuclease (11-13). It is assumed that the polymerase subunits of FluA and FluB share similar if not identical functions.Despite their close phylogenetic relationship, intertypic reassortants between FluA and FluB viruses have not been described (14 -16). The reasons for this are not fully understood. There is evidence for a preferential virus type-specific recognition of viral promoter regions, which might contribute to the lack of such reassortants due to growth disadvantages (17,18). This impairment in viral growth was first observed with a FluA chimera containing a neur...