©
iForest -Biogeosciences and Forestry
IntroductionAsh dieback is an emerging fungal disease caused by the ascomycete Hymenoscyphus pseudoalbidus Queloz et al. (2011), anamorph Chalara fraxinea Kowalski (2006). This highly pathogenic fungus was most likely introduced from the Far East (Zhao et al. 2012). The first symptoms of the disease were observed in Poland in 1992, and since the pathogen has spread throughout Europe (Timmermann et al. 2011, Pautasso et al. 2013. Common ash (Fraxinus excelsior L.) and narrow-leaved ash (F. angustifolia Vahl.) are European ash species the most heavily affected by the pathogen (Kirisits et al. 2009, Gross et al. 2014, although some introduced ash species could also be attacked (Drenkhan & Hanso 2010).Control of the ash dieback is hardly possible in areas where the disease is already established (Gross et al. 2014). However, proper control measures should still be taken to prevent or at least to slow down further spread of the pathogen (Pautasso et al. 2013), or to eradicate the pathogen at locations where this is still possible (relatively small, spatially limited and recently infected areas). Furthermore, the protection of individual high-value ash trees should also be often provided. Chemical treatment may be one of the options in some cases, but data on effective chemical agents for control of the ash dieback pathogen are lacking.Ascospores that develop in apothecia on infected ash leaf debris from the previous year are the major source of new infections (Gross et al. 2012(Gross et al. , 2014. Leaf debris from the previous year represents an inoculum source for some other well-known tree diseases. Good examples are cherry leaf spot caused by Blumeriella jaapii (Rehm) Arx and apple scab caused by Venturia inaequalis (Cook) Wint. For control of both mentioned diseases, urea treatments of the infected leaves are used to reduce pathogen sporulation (Sutton et al. 2000. Thus, removal of the infected ash leaf debris (if possible) or treatment of the debris to prevent sporulation of H. pseudoalbidus could therefore be regarded as potential control measures (Cooke et al. 2013).The main aim of this study was to examine the effect of eight different fungicides that are effective against different pathogens of the Helotiales order as well as the effect of urea on mycelial growth in Petri plates and development of H. pseudoalbidus apothecia on fallen ash leaf petioles.
Materials and Methods
H. pseudoalbidus isolates used in testingFour Slovenian isolates of Hymenoscyphus pseudoalbidus were used in this study (Tab. 1). Isolates were previously obtained from necrotic F. excelsior wood samples and stored in the culture collection of the Laboratory for Forest Protection at the Slovenian Forestry Institute (ZLVG). The selected isolates were of different morphology in culture and represented different geographical regions of the country. Three weeks before treatment experiments (preliminary testing was planned on July 13 th , 2010, and the main testing on August 26 th , 2010), all four is...