2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.ajo.2004.07.038
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Morphologic analysis of stage 3 and stage 4 macular holes: Implications for treatment

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0
1

Year Published

2007
2007
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
4
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Modifications to the original procedure include the use of different tamponade agents such as gas or silicone oil, use of adjuncts such as autologus serum and fibrin, transforming growth factor beta, platelets, thrombin, and peeling of the internal limiting membrane (ILM). [2][3][4][5] Hole duration, stage, preoperative visual acuity, type of tamponade, or whether or not the ILM is peeled may be important predictors of success rate in macular hole surgery. 5 Today, practice differs widely in relation to whether or not ILM peeling is routinely undertaken as part of the procedure, the duration of gas tamponade, the use of and duration of patient positioning post-operatively, and whether or not cataract extraction is undertaken at the same time.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Modifications to the original procedure include the use of different tamponade agents such as gas or silicone oil, use of adjuncts such as autologus serum and fibrin, transforming growth factor beta, platelets, thrombin, and peeling of the internal limiting membrane (ILM). [2][3][4][5] Hole duration, stage, preoperative visual acuity, type of tamponade, or whether or not the ILM is peeled may be important predictors of success rate in macular hole surgery. 5 Today, practice differs widely in relation to whether or not ILM peeling is routinely undertaken as part of the procedure, the duration of gas tamponade, the use of and duration of patient positioning post-operatively, and whether or not cataract extraction is undertaken at the same time.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, many authors refer to this finding as an outer retinal defect (ORD) [16,18,[22][23][24][25]. There is still controversy as to the precise impact of postoperative SRF in terms of final visual outcome.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…This year, a meta-analysis of the literature was attempted, and it was deduced that currently there is insufficient evidence to allow firm conclusions as to whether face-down posturing influences hole-closure rates 16. Recent OCT studies have demonstrated macular-hole closure as soon as 1 day after surgery, thus questioning the role of prolonged posturing 17. A randomised control trial using SF 6 gas for macular holes less than 500 μm found no significant differences in anatomical and visual success rates in posturing versus non-posturing groups, a finding recently replicated by a group in Japan 18–20…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%