2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.joms.2009.12.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Morphologic and Bony Structural Changes in the Mandible After a Unilateral Injection of Botulinum Neurotoxin in Adult Rats

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
46
2
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(54 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
5
46
2
1
Order By: Relevance
“…16) Other reports found no change in BMD with a decline in mechanical stress. [18][19][20] In the present study, no significant differences were found in BMD between the occlusion and non-occlusion sides in either Al or Ba. This may be because measurements were taken in cortical bone 17,21) and no resorption had taken place in Al as no teeth were extracted.…”
Section: Bmdcontrasting
confidence: 72%
“…16) Other reports found no change in BMD with a decline in mechanical stress. [18][19][20] In the present study, no significant differences were found in BMD between the occlusion and non-occlusion sides in either Al or Ba. This may be because measurements were taken in cortical bone 17,21) and no resorption had taken place in Al as no teeth were extracted.…”
Section: Bmdcontrasting
confidence: 72%
“…When we measured mass at 4 weeks, it was about 20% less than control values (Table 1). This moderate reduction in muscle mass falls within the 6%-40% range calculated from studies on rat masseter [20, 21] and mouse hindlimb [25], and as in these other studies may reflect edema, fibrosis or fat deposition [4, 45]. …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 57%
“…Because all rabbits received the same daily ration, no difference in weight would be expected even if BTX harmed food intake, which is unlikely based on previous studies [21, 23]. Somewhat more surprising is that chewing was so little altered by a treatment that dramatically diminished the EMG and force of one of the largest muscles of mastication.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…BoNT/A treatment of the masseter reduces muscle force and indeed has been used for that purpose after condylar fracture. 10,11 However, loss of muscle force typically leads to rapid loss of bone mass in the mandible 12 as well as in limb bones. 13,14 Radiologically, the mandibular condyle is strongly affected by administration of BoNT/A to the masseter.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%