1999
DOI: 10.1080/17453674.1999.11744818
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Morphologic review of 1000 soft tissue sarcomas from the Scandinavian Sarcoma Group (SSG) Register

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
30
0
5

Year Published

2004
2004
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

3
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
30
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…33 A standardized protocol was used for the review process. The LMS diagnoses for all tumors that were included were confirmed based on morphology that showed smooth muscle differentiation and positive immunohistochemical staining (IHC) for a-smooth muscle actin and desmin in most patients.…”
Section: Criteria For Inclusionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…33 A standardized protocol was used for the review process. The LMS diagnoses for all tumors that were included were confirmed based on morphology that showed smooth muscle differentiation and positive immunohistochemical staining (IHC) for a-smooth muscle actin and desmin in most patients.…”
Section: Criteria For Inclusionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…19,20 With regard to bone sarcomas, all osteosarcomas were high-grade malignant. Chondrosarcomas were graded in three grades and dedifferentiated.…”
Section: Microscopic Evaluation and Reporting Of Cnb And Surgical Excmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…During the last decade the histogenesis or line of differentiation of MFH has been debated among sarcoma pathologists. Based on thorough re-examination, including the clinical presentation and extensive immunostaining, sometimes also with the use of electron microscopy and genetic analyses, a line of differentiation can be demonstrated in many of the tumors previously classified as MFH [33,46,47,69,109]. Currently, MFH is diagnosed by ruling out other pleomorphic and myxoid sarcomas of specific lineage, foremost liposarcoma and leimyosarcoma, as well as carcinomas, melanomas and lymphomas [48,90,93,112].…”
Section: Histopathologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The two malignancy grading systems most commonly used are the National Cancer Institute (NCI) system used in North America, and the Fédération Nationale des Centres de Lutte Contre le Cancer (FNCLCC) system used in most parts of Europe [23,31]. In Scandinavia, Sweden, Norway and Finland use a IV-tiered histological malignancy grading system based on cellularity, pleomorphism, nuclear atypia, tumor necrosis and mitotic rate [6,107,109], whereas a III-tiered system is used in Denmark [120]. High malignancy grade is a strong prognostic factor for metastasis [25,55,116,165,193].…”
Section: Malignancy Gradementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation