1987
DOI: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.1987.tb43591.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Morphological and Behavioral Evidence for Chemoreception by Predaceous Stonefly Nymphs and Their Mayfly Prey

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

1996
1996
1996
1996

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 2 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is indicated in the choice experiment where the sensory blocking agent is applied to the palpi and legs and the mites were unable to locate the food source in contrast to those mites without the blocking agent which attempted to feed on the discs with ground up tissue. Chemosensory cues are also used by predaceous stonefly nymphs to detect the mayfly immatures that are a major food source (Martinez, 1987). Marine crustaceans also employed antennal and leg sensilla in locating a food source (Derby and Atema, 1982;Moore et al, 1991).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is indicated in the choice experiment where the sensory blocking agent is applied to the palpi and legs and the mites were unable to locate the food source in contrast to those mites without the blocking agent which attempted to feed on the discs with ground up tissue. Chemosensory cues are also used by predaceous stonefly nymphs to detect the mayfly immatures that are a major food source (Martinez, 1987). Marine crustaceans also employed antennal and leg sensilla in locating a food source (Derby and Atema, 1982;Moore et al, 1991).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%