2020
DOI: 10.1007/s11676-020-01247-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Morphological and genetic differentiation in isolated populations of Mexican beech Fagus grandifolia subsp. mexicana

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 40 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Beeches are ideal study objects because of the low species number and well-documented fossil record. Better understanding the diversity we observed and the putatively ancestral variants will require material from East Asian species not included in the present study: F. engleriana, F. hayatae, F. longipetiolata, and F. lucida, as well as from the yet poorly studied (eastern) North American F. grandifolia (but see Galván-Hernández et al, 2020). Similarly, nothing is known about 5S-IGS gene pools of East Asian and American oaks (and little about their ITS diversity); nevertheless, phylogenomic data of North American and French oaks have anticipated the existence of complex species relationships (Lepoittevin et al, 2015;Hipp et al, 2019).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Beeches are ideal study objects because of the low species number and well-documented fossil record. Better understanding the diversity we observed and the putatively ancestral variants will require material from East Asian species not included in the present study: F. engleriana, F. hayatae, F. longipetiolata, and F. lucida, as well as from the yet poorly studied (eastern) North American F. grandifolia (but see Galván-Hernández et al, 2020). Similarly, nothing is known about 5S-IGS gene pools of East Asian and American oaks (and little about their ITS diversity); nevertheless, phylogenomic data of North American and French oaks have anticipated the existence of complex species relationships (Lepoittevin et al, 2015;Hipp et al, 2019).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%